On 15351 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
- April 27
Wfm.
--
bye, Joerg
On 15286 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
- Feb 9
- Feb 16
Can deal with both.
--
bye, Joerg
On 15077 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> - July 7th
>> - July 14th
>> Are people available for either or both of those dates?
> The 7th is looking like the favourite so far (although would mean
> freezing next weekend), but we still need an ftp-master (N)ACK on
> either / both date.
No way f
On 15037 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> - May 26th (meaning freeze this coming weekend, which might be a big
> ask)
No.
> - Jun 2nd (which may require an unusual SRM)
Possible.
> - Jun 9th (getting quite a way out of cadence, but maybe that can't be
>helped)
Possible.
--
bye
On 15037 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> - 23rd Jun
Ok.
> - 7th July
No.
--
bye, Joerg
On 14944 March 1977, Julien Cristau wrote:
> we shipped 9.3 a couple of months ago, so we're overdue for 9.4.
> Can you please let us know your availability on the following:
> - March 3
> - March 10
Can do.
> - March 17
Not very good
> - March 24
> - March 31
No way.
--
bye, Joerg
On 14714 March 1977, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these
> suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible?
> 8/9 July (probably a bit soon)
> 15/16 July
Both of them don't work for me.
> 22/23 July
That I could do.
--
bye, Joerg
On 14611 March 1977, Julien Cristau wrote:
> * April 8-9
No
> * April 15-16
Possible
> * April 22-23
Ok
> * April 29-30
Ok
> * May 6-7
No.
--
bye, Joerg
On 14526 March 1977, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Jan 7th/8th
> Jan 14th/15th
Should work.
> Jan 21st/22nd
> Jan 28th/29th - Cambridge BSP, probably not ideal
> Feb 4th/5th - FOSDEM, probably not great either
> Feb 11th/12th
None of them for me.
--
bye, Joerg
On 14307 March 1977, Julien Cristau wrote:
> with wheezy EOL, we should get a final point release out. In order to
> avoid version skew, it'd be good to have a jessie point release around
> the same time, so if that works for everyone let's do them both on the
> same Saturday again.
> June 4th/5t
On 14120 March 1977, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> It is worth noting that live-build is not a Debian project, it is an
> external project that claims to be an official Debian project. This is
> something that needs to be fixed.
It is worth noting that you do not declare such things. Such an attitude
On 14037 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> We're somewhat overdue for both 8.2 and 7.9 now (in that order). Some
> potential September dates:
> 5/6th - okay for me
> 12/13th - the 12th doesn't work for me until at least mid-afternoon
> 19th/20th - looks okay
> 26th/27th - looks okay
All dates d
On 13951 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> > Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th
>> > for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work
>> > for people?
>> Sounds ok to me. Start at 10 UTC or earlier/later?
> I was assuming either 8ish
On 13947 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> > As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to
>> > start planning for the first point release.
>> > We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9
>> > really wants to take place after 8.1, as we have s
>> According to the normal schedule, the point release for 7.3 is due
>> somewhere around 12th December.
>> How does everybody look for the weekends of:
>> 14th/5th
>> 21st/22nd
>> 28th/29th December?
> Based on the responses so far, if we want to be sure to have an
> ftpmaster, SRM and CD-master
On 13209 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Based on some informal queries a little while ago, the weekend of 15/16
> June looks like a good date for the first wheezy point release. Would
> that work for everyone?
I'll be away then, with a TZ=UTC+8 and not very good net connection.
So I'm basic
>> > As an opening gambit, I'd propose we look at one of the following
>> > Saturdays in January: 14th, 21st, 28th.
>> 21st and 28th (with the respective day after the actual release day, to
>> do the live images) are fine for me.
> The 28th would be preferable for me. Would that still work for e
17 matches
Mail list logo
