>These opinions are my own and do not represent an official statement by
>Debian or any of its subprojects.
That clarifies everything for me. You have been, in effect, posting your
opinion but with an appearance of authority. I can respect that as you are
trying to maintain peaceful relations, whi
These opinions are my own and do not represent an official statement by
Debian or any of its subprojects.
On 18/11/15 08:52 PM, Michael . wrote:
> With regards to a couple of points you have made in this, and your
> previous, post nothing about Live Build is clear anymore. Actually
> that is incor
I apologise for any confusion caused by my previous reply.
With regards to a couple of points you have made in this, and your
previous, post nothing about Live Build is clear anymore. Actually that is
incorrect, the only thing that is clear is Daniel has given up with it as a
Debian project and as
On 18/11/15 07:15 PM, Michael . wrote:
> Correct me if I am wrong but I'm not sure this is the right list for
> this. Live Wrapper and Live build are 2 separate projects run by, or
> at least they were until Live Build has been discontinued, 2 differnt
> groups.
First of all, to clarify, "Live Bui
Correct me if I am wrong but I'm not sure this is the right list for this.
Live Wrapper and Live build are 2 separate projects run by, or at least
they were until Live Build has been discontinued, 2 differnt groups.
If you want to message the Live Wrapper group I suggest you contact Debian
CD and
1) Current live-wrapper implementation hardcodes 'Debian GNU/Linux Live'
string in the bootloader entries as you can see here:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-live/live-wrapper.git/tree/lbng/grub.py?id=4c908cd1682f5d15912810a33c71c35a54fc7115
I would like to be able to set a 'distributio
1) I make the assumption that live-wrapper currently supports to build
an x86 system with both a 586 kernel and amd64 kernel in the same iso.
2) I would like live-wrapper to have support for arch automatic
detection at boot. That means that the bootloader chooses the right
kernel depending on
Le 18/11/2015 19:47, Hans-J. Ullrich a écrit :
Dear list,
I am using live-build for building kali-linux images. The standard build
procedure is working well with live-build. But for my purposes I have some
special needs, which the documentation of live-build does not explain.
I hope, someone ex
On Tuesday 17 November 2015 20:33:19 David Ansart wrote:
> It did not worked. live-build 4.0.3-1 is it inconsistent with overlay.
> Must i do another thing ?
Does it work without backports enabled?
I build an image (with live-build 5.0~a11-1) from a config I had laying around
with jessie, but wi
Hello,
I am using live-build to build a custom kali linux 2.0 image, however when I
try to modify the basic build environment to add some customizations, the
resulting iso is unbootable.
What I want to do:
I want to enable brltty on the running live kali image.
What I have done:
I
Dear list,
I am using live-build for building kali-linux images. The standard build
procedure is working well with live-build. But for my purposes I have some
special needs, which the documentation of live-build does not explain.
I hope, someone experienced can help me.
This is, what I want t
11 matches
Mail list logo
