On 05/19/2014 05:02 AM, casibu wrote:
> how can i install firefox. Because to put friefox just in the
> mylist.chroot file, would mybe not work?
You can install the latest version of Firefox from Ubuntuzilla:
http://ubuntuzilla.sourceforge.net
You want to uninstall Iceweasel before installing F
On Mon, 19 May 2014 14:23:34 +0200
chals wrote:
to make thing clear:
this is not a po4a's issue i believe
as i can see no change to change behavior between those 2 versions.
i also compared 2 versions of gettext but the diff was 160k of lines,
and 18k lines remains after dropped for some os spe
Hi,
you can donwnload the Firefox here http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/
You don't have to install the Linux version, but only extract the tar.bz2 to a
folder with user rights and start the firefox script.
Updates are running as in the Windows version - from the firefox itself.
have fun
Package: broadcom-sta-dkms
Version: 6.30.223.141-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi
Currently broadcom-sta-dkms just blacklists the free drivers
unconditionally. This is OK on a normal system, but a problem for live
systems intended to be used on a wide range of hardware. There the
blacklisting
Greetings,
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:02 AM, casibu wrote:
> hello,
>
> how can i install firefox. Because to put friefox just in the
> mylist.chroot file,
> would mybe not work?
>
Not sure this helps but Iceweasel is re-branded Firefox.
>
> thanks
>
> casib
>
> -
hello,
how can i install firefox. Because to put friefox just in the
mylist.chroot file,
would mybe not work?
thanks
casib
-
VFEmail.net - http://www.vfemail.net
ONLY AT VFEmail! - Use our Metadata Mitigator to keep your email out of the
NSA's h
Niltze (Hello)!
I have patched a couple of pristine kernels (form kernel.org) to
support reiser4 fs and I have one of them running in a reiser4
formatted root partition. Since Debian has no installer supporting
reiser4, I built a debian-live by simply adding my modified kernel and
reiser4progs int
Hi,
This message is mainly informative but I thought it could be of
interest for some people. First of all, let's make these things clear:
- This situation has been known for a very long time, possibly months.
So nothing really new. At first I thought that it was just a bug, but
after some time I
On Sunday 18 May 2014 21:34:02 Richard Nelson wrote:
> The field param was designed to be utilized as suggested, but due to
> potential legal issues it has been set to read only so that only main is
> included. The potential for legal issues have been discussed before and
> there appear to be some
