On 22/02/14 02:04 AM, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> BTW if I ever get this business card-sized CD-ROM image command line
> rescue image small enough to actually fit on my 200 MB businesscard
> CD-ROMs are you interested in the configs etc (any particular license,
> release needed?) for such image?
I d
On 09/02/14 07:37 AM, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On 09/02/14 03:38 AM, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
>> Package: live-build
>> Version: 3.0.5-1
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> live-build is adding gnuplot to my images even though no package in Depends
>> or Recommends for gnuplot
>> is in package-lists nor is eve
On 02/22/2014 12:31 AM, Don Raikes wrote:
> Is there any limit to the size of a usb flash drive that can be used for
> creating a live-bootable debian system?
there's no live specific limit.
depending on what filesystem you choose for the binary image, you can
hit maxfilesize or maxfilesystemsize
On 02/21/2014 07:13 AM, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> Machine: MacBook Pro Retina 13-inch late-2012 (MacbookPro10,2)
i'm afraid linux never worked properly on apple hardware anyway, but
thank you anyway for your status update on it.
personally, i can't do anything about it, i (deliberatly) don't own
On 02/21/2014 02:23 AM, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> Ok, so IFF there is a bug it is in apt.
that's my claim, yes.
> unless live-build supresses some messages from apt
> showing packages being installed
live-build really doesn't do anything else then calling an apt-get
install $your_packages, and i
Hello, Is there any limit to the size of a usb flash drive that can be used for creating a live-bootable debian system? My binary.hybrid.iso image is roughly 2.8gb in size, and my flash drive is a 64gb drive from PNY. Is there any reason this shouldn’t work? -- Sincerely, DonDON RAIKES | Accessibil
On 2014-02-18 06:57, Stefan Baur wrote:
Am 18.02.2014 12:51, schrieb Ben Armstrong:
Are we just going to argue about this unceasingly or will you please
just take our word for it?
Well, instead of assuming that he's saying you're a bunch of liars, it
might help to explain the technical and con
Package: live-build
Version: 3.0.5-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
When building a CD with the LB_DEBIAN_INSTALLER="live" option,
live-build will include a significant number of .deb packages that are
(as far as I can tell) not actually needed for installation.
The 'binary_debian
On 21/02/14 11:06 AM, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> On 21/02/14 05:04 AM, Diederik de Haas wrote:
>> On Thursday 20 February 2014 20:23:17 Daniel Dickinson wrote:
>>> I still suspect a bug because NONE of the Recommends on or Depends packages
>>> for gnuplot are shown as being installed
>>
>> Maybe I'
On 21/02/14 05:04 AM, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Thursday 20 February 2014 20:23:17 Daniel Dickinson wrote:
>> I still suspect a bug because NONE of the Recommends on or Depends packages
>> for gnuplot are shown as being installed
>
> Maybe I'm overlooking something, but have you started/booted
components locales=de_DE"
LB_BOOTLOADER="grub"
LB_DEBIAN_INSTALLER="true"
LB_ISO_APPLICATION="Debian Live"
LB_ISO_PREPARER="live-build; http://packages.qa.debian.org/live-build";
LB_ISO_PUBLISHER="Debian Live project; http://live.debian.net/;
debian-live@
ed binary options
LB_APT_INDICES=""
LB_BOOTAPPEND_INSTALL=""
LB_BOOTAPPEND_LIVE="live components locales=de_DE"
LB_BOOTLOADER="grub"
LB_DEBIAN_INSTALLER="true"
LB_ISO_APPLICATION="Debian Live"
LB_ISO_PREPARER="live-buil
On Thursday 20 February 2014 20:23:17 Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> I still suspect a bug because NONE of the Recommends on or Depends packages
> for gnuplot are shown as being installed
Maybe I'm overlooking something, but have you started/booted your image and
then did an "aptitude why gnuplot" ?
13 matches
Mail list logo
