Greetings,
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Sergey Filippov wrote:
> Hi! Look at this please
>
> http://live-build.debian.net/build/20101012.125811.533785962/
>
> there some error and package not been builded.
>
I have upgraded l-b.d.n to the latest 2.x code base. Please try your
build again.
>
Hi! Look at this please
http://live-build.debian.net/build/20101012.125811.533785962/
there some error and package not been builded.
Sorry for my terrible English. Best regards, Sergey.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 10/12/2010 02:33 PM, Jose R R wrote:
>> The target machine has the latest GNU/ Linux Debian Lenny stable
>> installed to its hard drive -as well as Fedora- since its a multi-boot
>> machine. Hence, the default Debian Live build image is 2
On 10/12/2010 06:40 AM, Jose R R wrote:
> You try random "things" (procedures) when the stable ones do not
> provide the results intended -as specified in the instructions for
> Debian Live use.
I'm not criticizing you for experimenting. I'm just cautioning you
against handing out advice to other
On 10/12/2010 02:05 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> There is an issue with lb(1) describing lh(1) which should be fixed if
> it was not already but other than that the man pages are pretty good.
yes, that was fixed some hours ago, part of live-build 2.0.3.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgund
On 10/12/2010 02:33 PM, Jose R R wrote:
> The target machine has the latest GNU/ Linux Debian Lenny stable
> installed to its hard drive -as well as Fedora- since its a multi-boot
> machine. Hence, the default Debian Live build image is 2.6.32.x, then,
> is probably causing the issue. Nevertheless,
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 10/12/2010 12:56 PM, Jose R R wrote:
>> Subject: Debian live binary-hybrid.iso to CD-Media hangs (October 8, 2010)
>
> reading from my answers there, i think your way of image building is
> strange. it's sort of impossible to get hosts so
On 10/12/2010 12:56 PM, Jose R R wrote:
> Subject: Debian live binary-hybrid.iso to CD-Media hangs (October 8, 2010)
reading from my answers there, i think your way of image building is
strange. it's sort of impossible to get hosts sources.list into the
target image, unless configured explicitly m
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Mark Schneider
wrote:
> Jose,
>
> it looks like you don't understand some issues how live builder works (s.
> above)
>
> On 12.10.2010 12:56, Jose R R wrote:
[...]
> If you user recursive grep in you build dir/ you will find as follows
> (example with "ironm" as us
On 12 October 2010 11:20, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On 12/10/10 06:09 AM, Vitaly wrote:
>> Okay, I admit bad joke with a man lh config.
>> However, this does not eliminate the illogical and not intuitive man
>> lh_config and man lb_config
>> And so carefully did not want to see here.
>> As an example
Jose,
it looks like you don't understand some issues how live builder works
(s. above)
On 12.10.2010 12:56, Jose R R wrote:
it does not matter how you name the user, the user is still created at
runtime when you boot the image, not when you build it.
Assuming an user that I *especified
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:10 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 10/12/2010 11:40 AM, Jose R R wrote:
>> I believe you missed (above):
>> I *explicitily* specified an user name of my own that I could grep in
>> config/* files.
>
> it does not matter how you name the user, the user is still created at
>
On 10/12/2010 11:40 AM, Jose R R wrote:
> I believe you missed (above):
> I *explicitily* specified an user name of my own that I could grep in
> config/* files.
it does not matter how you name the user, the user is still created at
runtime when you boot the image, not when you build it.
> I thin
Accepted:
live-boot-initramfs-tools_2.0.8-1_all.deb
to main/l/live-boot/live-boot-initramfs-tools_2.0.8-1_all.deb
live-boot_2.0.8-1.diff.gz
to main/l/live-boot/live-boot_2.0.8-1.diff.gz
live-boot_2.0.8-1.dsc
to main/l/live-boot/live-boot_2.0.8-1.dsc
live-boot_2.0.8-1_all.deb
to main/l/li
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Ben Armstrong
wrote:
> On 12/10/10 05:45 AM, Jose R R wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:28 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
>>> On 10/12/2010 10:15 AM, Jose R R wrote:
I started with the same version for both and on the second and
subsequent attempts building
Accepted:
live-build-cgi_2.0.3-1_all.deb
to main/l/live-build/live-build-cgi_2.0.3-1_all.deb
live-build_2.0.3-1.diff.gz
to main/l/live-build/live-build_2.0.3-1.diff.gz
live-build_2.0.3-1.dsc
to main/l/live-build/live-build_2.0.3-1.dsc
live-build_2.0.3-1_all.deb
to main/l/live-build/live-
Thank you for workaround.
I have not found corresponding bug in initramfs-tools bug tracker. Do
I have to create one?
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 10/08/2010 12:39 PM, Nikolay Kasatkin wrote:
>> Sorry, but I'm finally confused... Seems that DNS resolving bug was
>> f
live-boot_2.0.8-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
live-boot_2.0.8-1.dsc
live-boot_2.0.8.orig.tar.gz
live-boot_2.0.8-1.diff.gz
live-boot_2.0.8-1_all.deb
live-boot-initramfs-tools_2.0.8-1_all.deb
live-initramfs_2.0.8-1_all.deb
Greetings,
You
On 12/10/10 06:09 AM, Vitaly wrote:
> Okay, I admit bad joke with a man lh config.
> However, this does not eliminate the illogical and not intuitive man
> lh_config and man lb_config
> And so carefully did not want to see here.
> As an example
>
> gedit -> g_edit -> g edit -> s edit
> and man s_e
live-build_2.0.3-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
live-build_2.0.3-1.dsc
live-build_2.0.3.orig.tar.gz
live-build_2.0.3-1.diff.gz
live-build_2.0.3-1_all.deb
live-build-cgi_2.0.3-1_all.deb
live-helper_2.0.3-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian
Okay, I admit bad joke with a man lh config.
However, this does not eliminate the illogical and not intuitive man
lh_config and man lb_config
And so carefully did not want to see here.
As an example
gedit -> g_edit -> g edit -> s edit
and man s_edit
would be very logical to the precepts of your mo
On 12/10/10 05:45 AM, Jose R R wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:28 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
>> On 10/12/2010 10:15 AM, Jose R R wrote:
>>> I started with the same version for both and on the second and
>>> subsequent attempts building the image, the regular user was not
>>> created even if veri
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:28 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 10/12/2010 10:15 AM, Jose R R wrote:
>> I started with the same version for both and on the second and
>> subsequent attempts building the image, the regular user was not
>> created even if verified in the relevant config/* files.
>
> you
On 10/12/2010 10:15 AM, Jose R R wrote:
> I started with the same version for both and on the second and
> subsequent attempts building the image, the regular user was not
> created even if verified in the relevant config/* files.
you can't 'verify' the user creation throuhg grepping config/*, aga
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 10/12/2010 07:23 AM, Jose R R wrote:
>> I experienced the same using the live-build package from the regular
>> Debian repositories. But the issue disappeared when I upgraded to
>> experimental live-build 3.x. Due however to other issues
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 599879 live-build
Bug #599879 [live-helper] live-helper: Live Builder does not create the user
account
Bug reassigned from package 'live-helper' to 'live-build'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions live-build/2.0.2-1.
> retitle 599
reassign 599879 live-build
retitle 599879 does not create the user account
severity 599879 normal
tag 599879 moreinfo
tag 599879 unreproducible
tag 599879 - sid
thanks
On 10/12/2010 04:57 AM, Juan Fernando Jaramillo wrote:
> And live builder does not create the user.
first, the user is created by
On 10/12/2010 07:23 AM, Jose R R wrote:
> I experienced the same using the live-build package from the regular
> Debian repositories. But the issue disappeared when I upgraded to
> experimental live-build 3.x. Due however to other issues encountered
> (as well as Daniel's advice) I downgraded to
>
28 matches
Mail list logo
