Re: binary_local-packageslists

2010-07-12 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 07/13/2010 02:27 AM, Vitaly wrote: > It seems nothing special) > I plan to make similar DVD Ubuntu from Debian. > This is utopia? ) a 'ubuntu like' dvd you can do with debian, and as far as i could see when i last looked at an ubuntu dvd image, they do not have multiple repositories on the dv

Re: binary_local-packageslists

2010-07-12 Thread Vitaly
> would you mind being a bit more verbose about your plans? It seems nothing special) I plan to make similar DVD Ubuntu from Debian. This is utopia? ) Another example : Sometimes you need skype on LiveCD, but sometimes it is not necessary. To do this, I add skype to the list of packages binary

Re: binary_local-packageslists

2010-07-12 Thread Daniel Baumann
dan...@debian.org wrote: > that wouldn't work, since d-i doesn't support that. so, first, d-i > would need to be updated to support that in some way. sorry, i might be wrong on that. of course you can specify multiple repositories to install from in d-i (this one i knew already before). however,

Re: binary_local-packageslists

2010-07-12 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 07/13/2010 12:33 AM, Vitaly wrote: > It is not about "d-i" packages. ...but binary_local-packageslists is for creating the repository needed for d-i when you want to specify additional packages to be installed beyond the content of netinstiso and are not included in the live system either. > I

Re: still no torrents for debian-live 5.0.5

2010-07-12 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Tuesday 13 July 2010 00:08:59 Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:01:21PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:38:29PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > >>On 07/12/2010 11:30 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >>> I'm assuming that you'd like them making for *.iso, *.i

Re: binary_local-packageslists

2010-07-12 Thread Vitaly
It is not about "d-i" packages. If we use a repository "sid" and "testing", then we obtain all binary packages from the repository "sid" to "testing". Thus, loss of information about the origin of the package on disk. Somehow this is not right ... > ... we are not > in charge for that and have n

Re: still no torrents for debian-live 5.0.5

2010-07-12 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:01:21PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:38:29PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: >>On 07/12/2010 11:30 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>> I'm assuming that you'd like them making for *.iso, *.img, *.tar.gz and >>> *.squashfs ? >> >>assuming that the ressou

Re: still no torrents for debian-live 5.0.5

2010-07-12 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:38:29PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: >On 07/12/2010 11:30 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> I'm assuming that you'd like them making for *.iso, *.img, *.tar.gz and >> *.squashfs ? > >assuming that the ressources are not infinite, i would only create >torrents for the isos and

Re: binary_local-packageslists

2010-07-12 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 07/12/2010 11:40 PM, Vitaly wrote: > It would be nice to be able to not mix different repositories in one. that wouldn't work, since d-i doesn't support that. so, first, d-i would need to be updated to support that in some way. > And would not disable the local repository CDROM after installin

Re: Should a config/chroot_local-packages-exclude be useful ?

2010-07-12 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 07/11/2010 12:26 PM, Philippe Lelédy wrote: > So a local exclude mechanism would be welcomed. i personally don't think so. first of all, if packages lists are not working (because testing/unstable changes), then they need to be fixed. an exclude mechanism doesn't save anything there, imho. se

Re[2]: binary_local-packageslists

2010-07-12 Thread Vitaly
Thank you too)) A small request: It would be nice to be able to not mix different repositories in one. And would not disable the local repository CDROM after installing the system. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Re: binary_local-packageslists

2010-07-12 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 07/12/2010 04:05 PM, Vitaly wrote: > section "main" - it is right? you have found a bug, i've fixed it in git. binary_local-packageslists are very rarely used, thanks for having spottet it ;) Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: