Re: login to live debian

2010-01-24 Thread Daniel Baumann
mictlan tecutli wrote: > yes i´m pretty sure xdm does not support autologin. but it would be nice to > get a light weight display manager to do autologin, gdm is fairly heavy. i´ve > attempted with slim, but have not figured out yet how to do autologin with > slim. its fairly straight forward to

RE: login to live debian

2010-01-24 Thread Wei Xue
As you said, it is better to start X without display manager. Using bash script, in chroot local hooks you can do that. -Original Message- From: mictlan tecutli [mailto:mictlan.tecutl...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 10:17 AM To: debian-live@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: login

Re: login to live debian

2010-01-24 Thread mictlan tecutli
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:06:37 +0100 Daniel Baumann wrote: > xdm is currently not supported for autologin by live-initramfs, i'm not > even sure it's possible to do an autologin. yes i´m pretty sure xdm does not support autologin. but it would be nice to get a light weight display manager to do

Re: custom fstab for live-cd (also after installation)

2010-01-24 Thread mictlan tecutli
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:31:57 +0100 rosea grammostola wrote: > Mount a tmpfs on /tmp. You should have a lot of swap space available > in case some programs try to write very large files there. > In your /etc/fstab add a line: my knowledge is shaky on all of this stuff, but as i understand it the

Re: RFC: live-initramfs 2.x features

2010-01-24 Thread Sebastian Ortwein
Daniel Baumann schrieb: Hi, over the time, the current live-initramfs has shown that new features cannot be added without ugly hacks and that it needs to be rewritten in a more modern, modular way. As a first step, I'd like to gather a list of features (not their implementation!, that's a step

Re: RFC: live-initramfs 2.x features

2010-01-24 Thread Michael Prokop
* Daniel Baumann wrote: > Michael Prokop wrote: >> * Provide a bootoption which displays the currently executed code. >> This avoids panic on user's side if something takes longer than >> usual, so let’s inform the user instead. > what do you understand under 'display executed code', somethi

Processed: tagging 561712

2010-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 561712 + patch Bug #561712 [live-magic] live-magic: helpers now installed in /usr/share/live-helper/helpers and not /usr/bin Added tag(s) patch. > End of message, s

Re: aufs-modules still hiding somewhere?

2010-01-24 Thread Daniel Baumann
Peter Daum wrote: > I still don't get, where the dependency on "aufs-modules-2.6-686" > comes from $LH_LINUX_PACKAGES > The only fix I could figure out is to put a > dummy package with that name under config/chroot_local-packages ... don't do that, use lh config --linux-packages 'linux-image-2.6

Re: automatic script after boot

2010-01-24 Thread Geert Stappers
Op 20100116 om 14:19 schreef Daniel Baumann: > Daniel Baumann wrote: > >> My build was done with 'lh, version 2.0~a3-1' from git. > > > > i'll check about that tomorrow, wanted to upload a4 anyway. > > i used current snapshots, precisely 2.0~a3+20091223.212718 from > live.debian.net/debian, and i

Re: aufs-modules still hiding somewhere?

2010-01-24 Thread Peter Daum
Daniel Baumann wrote: your problem is that the prebuilt aufs-modules-* packages were requested to be removed to early by the kernel team. until 2.6.32 migrates to squeeze, you cannot build squeeze images. in the meanwhile, just pin the kernel packages from sid. I still don't get, where the de