mictlan tecutli wrote:
> yes i´m pretty sure xdm does not support autologin. but it would be nice to
> get a light weight display manager to do autologin, gdm is fairly heavy. i´ve
> attempted with slim, but have not figured out yet how to do autologin with
> slim. its fairly straight forward to
As you said, it is better to start X without display manager.
Using bash script, in chroot local hooks you can do that.
-Original Message-
From: mictlan tecutli [mailto:mictlan.tecutl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 10:17 AM
To: debian-live@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: login
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:06:37 +0100
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> xdm is currently not supported for autologin by live-initramfs, i'm not
> even sure it's possible to do an autologin.
yes i´m pretty sure xdm does not support autologin. but it would be nice to get
a light weight display manager to do
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:31:57 +0100
rosea grammostola wrote:
> Mount a tmpfs on /tmp. You should have a lot of swap space available
> in case some programs try to write very large files there.
> In your /etc/fstab add a line:
my knowledge is shaky on all of this stuff, but as i understand it the
Daniel Baumann schrieb:
Hi,
over the time, the current live-initramfs has shown that new features
cannot be added without ugly hacks and that it needs to be rewritten in
a more modern, modular way.
As a first step, I'd like to gather a list of features (not their
implementation!, that's a step
* Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Michael Prokop wrote:
>> * Provide a bootoption which displays the currently executed code.
>> This avoids panic on user's side if something takes longer than
>> usual, so let’s inform the user instead.
> what do you understand under 'display executed code', somethi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 561712 + patch
Bug #561712 [live-magic] live-magic: helpers now installed in
/usr/share/live-helper/helpers and not /usr/bin
Added tag(s) patch.
>
End of message, s
Peter Daum wrote:
> I still don't get, where the dependency on "aufs-modules-2.6-686"
> comes from
$LH_LINUX_PACKAGES
> The only fix I could figure out is to put a
> dummy package with that name under config/chroot_local-packages ...
don't do that, use lh config --linux-packages 'linux-image-2.6
Op 20100116 om 14:19 schreef Daniel Baumann:
> Daniel Baumann wrote:
> >> My build was done with 'lh, version 2.0~a3-1' from git.
> >
> > i'll check about that tomorrow, wanted to upload a4 anyway.
>
> i used current snapshots, precisely 2.0~a3+20091223.212718 from
> live.debian.net/debian, and i
Daniel Baumann wrote:
your problem is that the prebuilt aufs-modules-* packages were requested
to be removed to early by the kernel team. until 2.6.32 migrates to
squeeze, you cannot build squeeze images. in the meanwhile, just pin the
kernel packages from sid.
I still don't get, where the de
10 matches
Mail list logo