[SOLVED] (was: Help! dh_build eats my binary.img!)

2008-09-28 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 08:37:43PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > | /usr/bin/lh_binary_usb-hdd: line 114: losetup.orig: command not found [...] > - loop-aes-utils (and maybe others) use dpkg-divert to take control It wor

Re: Help! dh_build eats my binary.img!

2008-09-28 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 08:37:43PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > | /usr/bin/lh_binary_usb-hdd: line 114: losetup.orig: command not found > > This indicates that your config/common file specifies: > > LH_LOSETUP="losetu

Re: Help! dh_build eats my binary.img!

2008-09-28 Thread Chris Lamb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > | /usr/bin/lh_binary_usb-hdd: line 114: losetup.orig: command not found This indicates that your config/common file specifies: LH_LOSETUP="losetup.orig" whilst you have removed whatever was diverting /sbin/losetup since you called lh_config the first time. - loop-

Re: Default user now UID 1000 instead of 999?

2008-09-28 Thread Chris Lamb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > this would break down if we wanted more than one user (with pre-defined > homes), right? Yes, it doesn't really work as cleanly for multiple users. On live systems this is probably a valid general assumption to be making. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chr

Help! dh_build eats my binary.img!

2008-09-28 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, as stated in the subject. Building an usb_hdd. Everything seems dandy (the sqhashfs gets built) -- the only conspicuous thing I see in the log is at the very end: | P: Begin copying binary local includes... | P: Begin executing local hooks...

Re: Default user now UID 1000 instead of 999?

2008-09-28 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 06:30:58PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Now it wouldn't be a problem exchanging 999 for 1000 here (it's my > > current workaround, in fact), but -- is 1000 stable now? > > Yes. Thanks! > > Or sha

Re: Default user now UID 1000 instead of 999?

2008-09-28 Thread Chris Lamb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Now it wouldn't be a problem exchanging 999 for 1000 here (it's my > current workaround, in fact), but -- is 1000 stable now? Yes. > Or shall I shift the chown to the boot phase of the live system? You shouldn't be chowning at all. Place your home directory files in /

live-helper 1.0.1-1 MIGRATED to testing

2008-09-28 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the live-helper source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.0.0-2 Current version: 1.0.1-1 -- This email is automatically generated; the Debian Release Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is responsible. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watc

live-initramfs 1.139.1-3 MIGRATED to testing

2008-09-28 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the live-initramfs source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.139.1-2 Current version: 1.139.1-3 -- This email is automatically generated; the Debian Release Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is responsible. See http://release.debian.org/testi

Default user now UID 1000 instead of 999?

2008-09-28 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lh_build --version lh_build, version 1.0.0 (as of fairly recent Lenny). Changing the "default user name" involves setting config/binary: # $LH_USERNAME: set username LH_USERNAME="gast" in config/binary. This works,