thanks Paul and Axel!
On Sun, May 05, 2024 at 01:18:30PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
[..]
> I don't like the Go idea, but I'm not involved in the lintian team nor
> in maintenance of adequate,
regardless, of your (lack of) involvement, I'd be curious to hear if you
have any specific, non-subjective c
On Sat, 2024-05-04 at 21:52 +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> I'm considering to ITA the adequate package, on the condition that (i)
> the folks taking care of it to date, and (ii) the lintian team would be
> okay for me to rewrite it in go. I understand that go is not the most
> popular of langu
Hi Serafeim,
Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> I'm considering to ITA the adequate package,
Cool!
> on the condition that (i) the folks taking care of it to date, and
> (ii) the lintian team
Can speak for both, more or less. :-)
> would be okay for me to rewrite it
Neither an objection from myself
hi folks,
I'm considering to ITA the adequate package, on the condition that (i)
the folks taking care of it to date, and (ii) the lintian team would be
okay for me to rewrite it in go. I understand that go is not the most
popular of languages in Debian and that lintian tools are mostly perl
and p
4 matches
Mail list logo
