Re: adequate maintenance

2024-05-05 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
thanks Paul and Axel! On Sun, May 05, 2024 at 01:18:30PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: [..] > I don't like the Go idea, but I'm not involved in the lintian team nor > in maintenance of adequate, regardless, of your (lack of) involvement, I'd be curious to hear if you have any specific, non-subjective c

adequate maintenance

2024-05-04 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
hi folks, I'm considering to ITA the adequate package, on the condition that (i) the folks taking care of it to date, and (ii) the lintian team would be okay for me to rewrite it in go. I understand that go is not the most popular of languages in Debian and that lintian tools are mostly perl and p

Bug#548805: lintian: Packages using update-inetd must depend on inet-superserver

2009-09-28 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: lintian Version: 2.2.17 Severity: normal Hi, The tag maintainer-script-needs-depends-on-update-inetd recommends to depend on either inet-superserver or update-inetd, when it fact the later is redundant (a dependency on inet-superserver indirectly satisfies the update-inetd dependency) A