Bug#994577: lintian: node-* arch:all package should depends on nodejs:any and b-d on nodejs:native

Package: lintian Version: 2.104.0 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, In order to improve cross build of nodejs ecosystem, node-* arch:all package should depends on nodejs:any and b-d on nodejs:native Maybe this test should be restricted to ma: foreign package Bastien

Bug#994576: node-* package should not depends on nodejs except if it include an executable file under /usr/bin

Package: lintian Version: 2.104.0 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, node-* package should not depend on nodejs except if they ship a script under /usr/bin This is the current javascript policy and here lintian could help Bastien

Bug#994571: lintian: please warn javascript package including .node files "*/nodejs/.*\.node$' and ma:foreign

Le ven. 17 sept. 2021 à 21:20, Felix Lechner a écrit : > > Hi, > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 1:39 PM Bastien Roucariès > wrote: > > > > Package that include "/usr/(?:lib|share)/(?:[^/]+/)?/nodejs/.*\.node$' are > > arch:any package (include node plugin) and thus should be arch:any > > Thank you for

Bug#994571: lintian: please warn javascript package including .node files "*/nodejs/.*\.node$' and ma:foreign

Hi, On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 1:39 PM Bastien Roucariès wrote: > > Package that include "/usr/(?:lib|share)/(?:[^/]+/)?/nodejs/.*\.node$' are > arch:any package (include node plugin) and thus should be arch:any Thank you for this suggestion! The files in question are shipped in installable packag

Bug#994571: lintian: please warn javascript package including .node files "*/nodejs/.*\.node$' and ma:foreign

Package: lintian Version: 2.104.0 Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, Package that include "/usr/(?:lib|share)/(?:[^/]+/)?/nodejs/.*\.node$' are arch:any package (include node plugin) and thus should be arch:any Moreover in this case ma:foreign is a error (they are plugins) Bastien

Bug#512265: #512265: clarifying the intent of the bug report

Control: retitle -1 lintian: flag upstream tests missing from autopkgtest Hi Andrius, On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 9:21 AM Andrius Merkys wrote: > > I doubt this reflects the original intent of this bug > report. I agree with you, and picked yet another title. Please let me know what you think. > *

Processed: Re: Bug#512265: #512265: clarifying the intent of the bug report

Processing control commands: > retitle -1 lintian: flag upstream tests missing from autopkgtest Bug #512265 [lintian] lintian: Warn about unused autopkgtests Changed Bug title to 'lintian: flag upstream tests missing from autopkgtest' from 'lintian: Warn about unused autopkgtests'. -- 512265: h

Bug#512265: #512265: clarifying the intent of the bug report

Hi Felix, I noticed you changed the title of the bug report from "lintian: Warn if a test suite exists but is not run" to "lintian: Warn about unused autopkgtests", and I doubt this reflects the original intent of this bug report. I read the initial Raphael's message as asking to detect test suit

Processed: Re: Bug#743694: lintian: Downgrade most of privacy-breach* tags from severity: error to pedantic

Processing control commands: > severity -1 normal Bug #743694 [lintian] Downgrade most of privacy-breach* tags from severity: error to pedantic Bug #765503 [lintian] lintian: privacy-breach should be a warning, not an error Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' Severity set to 'normal' from '

Bug#743694: lintian: Downgrade most of privacy-breach* tags from severity: error to pedantic

Control: severity -1 normal Hi, On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 6:21 AM Daniel Leidert wrote: > > I would doubt our FTP masters if they accept packages with > lintian errors Actually, they do! The FTP Masters publish the list of tags they do not accept. [1] The privacy tags are not on it. Lintian offer

Processed: retitle 971732 to lintian: exempt Eolian output from font-in-non-font-package using new screen facility

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 971732 lintian: exempt Eolian output from font-in-non-font-package > using new screen facility Bug #971732 [lintian] lintian: Centrally manage overrides for package families Changed Bug title to 'lintian: exempt Eolian output from font-i

Processed: severity of 993613 is important

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 993613 important Bug #993613 [lintian] lintian: Complex regular subexpression recursion limit exceeded in cruft check Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

lintian_2.106.1~bpo11+1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:lintian is NEW. binary:lintian is NEW. source:lintian is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages a

lintian_2.106.1~bpo10+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into buster-backports->backports-policy

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:46:28 +0100 Source: lintian Binary: lintian Architecture: source all Version: 2.106.1~bpo10+1 Distribution: buster-backports Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers Changed-By: Chris

Processing of lintian_2.106.1~bpo11+1_amd64.changes

lintian_2.106.1~bpo11+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lintian_2.106.1~bpo11+1.dsc lintian_2.106.1~bpo11+1.tar.xz lintian_2.106.1~bpo11+1_all.deb lintian_2.106.1~bpo11+1_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host us

[Git][lintian/lintian] Pushed new tag 2.106.1_bpo11+1

Chris Lamb pushed new tag 2.106.1_bpo11+1 at lintian / lintian -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/tree/2.106.1_bpo11+1 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

Processing of lintian_2.106.1~bpo10+1_amd64.changes

lintian_2.106.1~bpo10+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lintian_2.106.1~bpo10+1.dsc lintian_2.106.1~bpo10+1.tar.xz lintian_2.106.1~bpo10+1_all.deb lintian_2.106.1~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host us

[Git][lintian/lintian] Pushed new tag 2.106.1_bpo10+1

Chris Lamb pushed new tag 2.106.1_bpo10+1 at lintian / lintian -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/tree/2.106.1_bpo10+1 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.