Bug#864212: marked as done (lintian: Please make output deterministic/reproducible)

Your message dated Fri, 6 Dec 2019 22:30:28 -0800 with message-id and subject line RFP: lintian-sort -- reproducibly sort the Lintian tool's output has caused the Debian Bug report #864212, regarding lintian: Please make output deterministic/reproducible to be marked as done. This means that yo

Bug#921449: marked as done (lintian: stop saying that GTK is misspelled)

Your message dated Fri, 6 Dec 2019 21:37:55 -0800 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#921449: lintian: stop saying that GTK is misspelled has caused the Debian Bug report #921449, regarding lintian: stop saying that GTK is misspelled to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#946320: lintian: Adjust blacklist on lindsay.d.o

Package: lintian Severity: wishlist Control: block -1 by 926543 Hi, Following the resolution of #926543, several packages can be removed from the blacklist in config.yaml. Please upgrade lindsay.d.o to the latest git revision before making the change. I only tested the latest source packages:

Processed: lintian: Adjust blacklist on lindsay.d.o

Processing control commands: > block -1 by 926543 Bug #946320 [lintian] lintian: Adjust blacklist on lindsay.d.o 946320 was not blocked by any bugs. 946320 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 946320: 926543 -- 946320: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946320 Debia

Bug#657390: lintian: Non-dh debhelper targets?

Hi, > Once build-arch and build-indep are supported by dpkg-buildpackage, > hopefully in the next week, and/or are required by Policy, please > could you apply the attached patch to move build-arch and build-indep > from recommended to required? With many people now using dh over the older explic

Processed: Bug#844274 marked as pending in lintian

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #844274 [lintian] wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright should not be raised for deleted files Added tag(s) pending. -- 844274: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844274 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or

Bug#907425: marked as done (lintian: Strange lintian.debian.org entry for matlab-gdf)

Your message dated Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:26:01 -0800 with message-id and subject line Probably fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #907425, regarding lintian: Strange lintian.debian.org entry for matlab-gdf to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#942493: 5000 is a tad too small (was Re: lintian: Please warn about overly-long header fields)

On 2019-12-06 13:16, Felix Lechner wrote: > Hi Aurelien, > > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 1:03 PM Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > > Is it also possible to allow "long Package-List"? > > Done in: > > > https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/43c29acbba043d33277ab0670234c7bd9c4077c9 Thanks fo

Bug#942493: 5000 is a tad too small (was Re: lintian: Please warn about overly-long header fields)

Hi Aurelien, On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 1:03 PM Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Is it also possible to allow "long Package-List"? Done in: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/43c29acbba043d33277ab0670234c7bd9c4077c9 Kind regards, Felix Lechner

Bug#898431: lintian.d.o: minimum version of file(1)

Hi Bastien, Your report did not indicate a minimum version of file(1), but in the meantime buster was released and lintian.d.o has been upgraded. Is this issue moot? If so, please feel free to close this bug. Kind regards Felix Lechner

Bug#942493: 5000 is a tad too small (was Re: lintian: Please warn about overly-long header fields)

Hi, On 2019-11-12 09:46, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Thorsten, > > > […] long Description field > > That's actually a good point, I've left the limit at 5000 and simply > allowed long "long descriptions". Is it also possible to allow "long Package-List"? This is the error I now got on the glibc pack

Bug#926543: lintian: Deadlock in source-copyright check on source:khronos-opencl-man/1.0~svn33624-4

Hi, This issue was fixed in: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/9d580d4401f7501a3b1634dfe69b116901826491 The problem was caused by unsuccessful network access in the backend XML::LibXML::SAX::Parser. The problematic packages contained XML files that somehow did not parse correc

Processed: Bug#926543 marked as pending in lintian

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #926543 [lintian] lintian: Deadlock in source-copyright check on source:khronos-opencl-man/1.0~svn33624-4 Added tag(s) pending. -- 926543: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926543 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.deb

Re: pkg-perl-tools and Lintian

Hi, On 06/12/2019 00:24, Felix Lechner wrote: > Hi, > > This email is a follow-up to > https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/pkg-perl-tools/merge_requests/9#note_124337. Thanks for the PR! > Would it make sense to integrate the checks in pkg-perl-tools into Lintian? > > The pur

lintian_2.39.0~bpo9+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into stretch-backports->backports-policy, stretch-backports

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 21:34:12 +0100 Source: lintian Binary: lintian Built-For-Profiles: nocheck Architecture: source all Version: 2.39.0~bpo9+1 Distribution: stretch-backports Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Lintian Mai