Bug#901274: [lintian] warn about *.md,.eslintrc, .npmignore, LICENSE, CHANGES, PATENTS, *.woff, *.ttf, *.woff.? under /usr/lib/node (may be /usr/lib ?)

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Chris Lamb wrote: > > > Hi Bastien ROUCARIES, > >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 12:07 AM, Chris Lamb wrote: >> > Hi Bastien, >> > >> >> > Unfortunately, I don't think these commits reach the level of quality >> >> > that Debian Developers would expect from Lintian. >>

Bug#901274: [lintian] warn about *.md,.eslintrc, .npmignore, LICENSE, CHANGES, PATENTS, *.woff, *.ttf, *.woff.? under /usr/lib/node (may be /usr/lib ?)

Hi Bastien, > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 12:07 AM, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Hi Bastien, > > > >> > Unfortunately, I don't think these commits reach the level of quality > >> > that Debian Developers would expect from Lintian. > >> > >> Ok could you get a glimpse at README branch > > > > Could you move

Bug#901274: [lintian] warn about *.md,.eslinltrc, .npmignore, LICENSE, CHANGES, PATENTS, *.woff, *.ttf, *.woff.? under /usr/lib/node (may be /usr/lib ?)

Hi Bastien ROUCARIES, > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 12:07 AM, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Hi Bastien, > > >> > Unfortunately, I don't think these commits reach the level of quality > >> > that Debian Developers would expect from Lintian. > >> > >> Ok could you get a glimpse at README branch > > > > Cou

Bug#901274: [lintian] warn about *.md,.eslintrc, .npmignore, LICENSE, CHANGES, PATENTS, *.woff, *.ttf, *.woff.? under /usr/lib/node (may be /usr/lib ?)

Hi Bastien ROUCARIES, > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 12:07 AM, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Hi Bastien, > > > >> > Unfortunately, I don't think these commits reach the level of quality > >> > that Debian Developers would expect from Lintian. > >> > >> Ok could you get a glimpse at README branch > > > > Co

Bug#901274: [lintian] warn about *.md,.eslintrc, .npmignore, LICENSE, CHANGES, PATENTS, *.woff, *.ttf, *.woff.? under /usr/lib/node (may be /usr/lib ?)

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 12:07 AM, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Bastien, > >> > Unfortunately, I don't think these commits reach the level of quality >> > that Debian Developers would expect from Lintian. >> >> Ok could you get a glimpse at README branch > > Could you move the other changes to this branc

Bug#901274: [lintian] warn about *.md,.eslintrc, .npmignore, LICENSE, CHANGES, PATENTS, *.woff, *.ttf, *.woff.? under /usr/lib/node (may be /usr/lib ?)

On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 11:09 PM, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Bastien > >> Just see it. Will corects thanks > > May I kindly suggest doing this work on a branch? > > I am happy to review your grammar and spelling but I would very much > like to keep the "master" branch releasable at any time. > > Unfor

Bug#901274: [lintian] warn about *.md,.eslintrc, .npmignore, LICENSE, CHANGES, PATENTS, *.woff, *.ttf, *.woff.? under /usr/lib/node (may be /usr/lib ?)

Hi Bastien, > > Unfortunately, I don't think these commits reach the level of quality > > that Debian Developers would expect from Lintian. > > Ok could you get a glimpse at README branch Could you move the other changes to this branch too (or a "901274" branch/MR or something?) :) Best wishe

Processed: Re: lintian -F internal error: cannot run shared-libs check on package binary

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 898809 + pending Bug #898809 [lintian] lintian -F internal error: cannot run shared-libs check on package binary Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 898809: https://bugs.deb

Bug#898809: lintian -F internal error: cannot run shared-libs check on package binary

tags 898809 + pending thanks Fixed in Git, pending upload: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/b8e38a685f1bd13217c7ae7e89b455a296177b33 debian/changelog | 5 + helpers/coll/objdump-info-helper | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Regar

Bug#901274: [lintian] warn about *.md,.eslintrc, .npmignore, LICENSE, CHANGES, PATENTS, *.woff, *.ttf, *.woff.? under /usr/lib/node (may be /usr/lib ?)

Hi Bastien > Just see it. Will corects thanks May I kindly suggest doing this work on a branch? I am happy to review your grammar and spelling but I would very much like to keep the "master" branch releasable at any time. Unfortunately, I don't think these commits reach the level of quality tha

Bug#901274: [lintian] warn about *.md,.eslintrc, .npmignore, LICENSE, CHANGES, PATENTS, *.woff, *.ttf, *.woff.? under /usr/lib/node (may be /usr/lib ?)

On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 10:59 PM, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Bastien, > >> Will begin to wrok on this bug > > (I trust you are seeing my comments on salsa.) Just see it. Will corects thanks Sorry for the delay I was removing a scratch on my screen with toothpaste... Bastien > > Regards, > > -- >

Bug#901274: [lintian] warn about *.md,.eslintrc, .npmignore, LICENSE, CHANGES, PATENTS, *.woff, *.ttf, *.woff.? under /usr/lib/node (may be /usr/lib ?)

Hi Bastien, > Will begin to wrok on this bug (I trust you are seeing my comments on salsa.) Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Bug#898809: lintian -F internal error: cannot run shared-libs check on package binary

atthias Klose wrote: > This causes the gcc-8-cross packages built on amd64 and i386 failing the > lintian > -F check during upload (packages at p.d.o/~d.../tmp). > > $ lintian -F ../gcc-8-cross_16_amd64.changes 2>&1 | tee ../log.lintian > Use of uninitialized value $lib in pattern match (m//) at

Bug#901274: [lintian] warn about *.md,.eslintrc, .npmignore, LICENSE, CHANGES, PATENTS, *.woff, *.ttf, *.woff.? under /usr/lib/node (may be /usr/lib ?)

On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 9:33 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 9:31 PM, Chris Lamb wrote: >> Hi Bastien, >> >>> > (This seems like a candidate for data/files/fnames.) >>> >>> Will add the fonts name ASAP, thanks >> >> I don't understand this, sorry... My remark about data/fil

Bug#901274: [lintian] warn about *.md,.eslintrc, .npmignore, LICENSE, CHANGES, PATENTS, *.woff, *.ttf, *.woff.? under /usr/lib/node (may be /usr/lib ?)

On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 9:31 PM, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Bastien, > >> > (This seems like a candidate for data/files/fnames.) >> >> Will add the fonts name ASAP, thanks > > I don't understand this, sorry... My remark about data/files/fnames > refers to this entire bug report, not to the fonts speci

Bug#901274: [lintian] warn about *.md,.eslintrc, .npmignore, LICENSE, CHANGES, PATENTS, *.woff, *.ttf, *.woff.? under /usr/lib/node (may be /usr/lib ?)

On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 9:25 PM, Chris Lamb wrote: > Bastien, > >> Documentation file (*.md, LICENSE, CHANGES, PATENTS) do not belong to this >> dir >> >> .eslintrc are jslint config file and should not be installed >> >> .npmignore is used in order to publish file under npm so do not install >>

Bug#901274: [lintian] warn about *.md,.eslintrc, .npmignore, LICENSE, CHANGES, PATENTS, *.woff, *.ttf, *.woff.? under /usr/lib/node (may be /usr/lib ?)

Hi Bastien, > > (This seems like a candidate for data/files/fnames.) > > Will add the fonts name ASAP, thanks I don't understand this, sorry... My remark about data/files/fnames refers to this entire bug report, not to the fonts specifically. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris La

Bug#901274: [lintian] warn about *.md,.eslintrc, .npmignore, LICENSE, CHANGES, PATENTS, *.woff, *.ttf, *.woff.? under /usr/lib/node (may be /usr/lib ?)

Bastien, > Documentation file (*.md, LICENSE, CHANGES, PATENTS) do not belong to this dir > > .eslintrc are jslint config file and should not be installed > > .npmignore is used in order to publish file under npm so do not install > > *.woff, *.ttf, *.woff. are fonts so go to fonts package (Th

Bug#901274: [lintian] warn about *.md,.eslintrc, .npmignore, LICENSE, CHANGES, PATENTS, *.woff, *.ttf, *.woff.? under /usr/lib/node (may be /usr/lib ?)

Package: lintian Version: 2.5.89 Severity: normal Hi, Documentation file (*.md, LICENSE, CHANGES, PATENTS) do not belong to this dir .eslintrc are jslint config file and should not be installed .npmignore is used in order to publish file under npm so do not install *.woff, *.ttf, *.woff. are f

Bug#901228: lintian: False positive for "r => littler (usr/lib/R/site-library/rjson/rpc_server/server.r) #!/usr/bin/r"

tags 901228 + pending thanks Fixed in Git, pending upload: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/95eaa1261286f18a8e286cec184f5f1a970336c3 data/scripts/interpreters | 2 +- debian/changelog | 4 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Regards, -- ,

Processed: Re: lintian: False positive for "r => littler (usr/lib/R/site-library/rjson/rpc_server/server.r) #!/usr/bin/r"

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 901228 + pending Bug #901228 [lintian] lintian: False positive for "r => littler (usr/lib/R/site-library/rjson/rpc_server/server.r) #!/usr/bin/r" Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Bug#901228: lintian: False positive for "r => littler (usr/lib/R/site-library/rjson/rpc_server/server.r) #!/usr/bin/r"

Package: lintian Severity: normal Hi, https://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/r-pkg-t...@alioth-lists.debian.net.html#r-cran-rjson shows E missing-dep-for-interpreter r => littler (usr/lib/R/site-library/rjson/rpc_server/server.r) #!/usr/bin/r r => littler (usr/lib/R/site-lib

Bug#901075: Please update the missing-dep-for-interpreter warning for python2

tags 901075 + moreinfo thanks Hi Matthias, > >>> Just to be clear, won't this cause 1000s of warnings due to most ^^^ > >>> packages depending on "python" and not "python2"? > >> > >> I certainly don't want to have these warnings, at least no

Processed: Re: Bug#901075: Please update the missing-dep-for-interpreter warning for python2

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 901075 + moreinfo Bug #901075 [lintian] Please update the missing-dep-for-interpreter warning for python2 Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 901075: https://bugs.debian.or