Re: complete clone of the debian website

Joey Hess: > http://www.491.org/projets/api/ > Shocking. And when stealing the HTML code, they even forgot to remove the reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as the creator. And doesn't their use of the Debian logo break the license? -- \\// peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ Statement concerni

Licensing woes

BILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. The End == P.S. For release 1.1.1, I decided to have the license more flexible and ... more professional, as a result of email-s from ibiblio Linux archive (Northern Carolina, USA) a

License considerations

Hi! I just want to ask the experts whether or not this license is DFSG free or not. To me, it looks that way, but I just want to make sure: ===[ cut ]=== This is the copyright notice for RA65, LINK65, LIBR65, and other Atari 8-bit programs. Said programs are Copyright 1989, by John R. D

Re: web site license

James A. Treacy on 1999-09-30: > > I'd rather we took advantage of DFSG point #4 and added something like: > Is everyone happy with what Joey has written? Whatever happened to this discussion about changing the website's license? -- \\// peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/

Re: New Debian Website License [LAST CHANCE]

Darren O. Benham: > I don't like the "or later" clause... I don't like it with the GPL, either. > It gives away too much control incase someone get's a wild bug and decides > the OPL (or GPL) should prohibit armenians (as an example) from distributing > the software... Can you even license someth

Re: New website License

Craig Small: > The Debian website has now changed its license to the Open Publication > License. The change should be visible in a day or so. Speaking of which, perhaps the reference to the "Debian penguin logotype" should be removed and/or replaced with a link to the logotype page? -- \\//