Question about RSA licence

pensc/browser/trunk/src/pkcs11/rsaref/ [2] http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/node.asp?id=2133#disclaimer [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/02/msg00110.html [4] http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#OriginalBSD -- Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Question about RSA licence

of getopt (LGPL)? > Thanks for working on this, Thanks to helping. [1] http://www.opensc.org/opensc/wiki/AuthorsAndCredits -- Ludovic Rousseau -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mozilla can't be GPL? (was: pkcs#11 license)

ws if they consider the RSA publicity clause in conflict with GPL? I can't find information about this problem in the Mozilla crypto FAQ [2]. Thanks, [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/09/msg00537.html [2] http://www.mozilla.org/crypto-faq.html#1-3 -- Ludovic Rousseau --

Re: Mozilla can't be GPL? (was: pkcs#11 license)

ng issues. Any idea of how we should contact Mozilla and RSA? I am really _not_ a diplomatic guy :-) Thanks, -- Ludovic Rousseau -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Question about RSA licence

Le Monday 31 October 2005 à 10:26:17, Florian Weimer a écrit: > * ludovic rousseau: > > > The RSA disclaimer is [2]: > > > > " Regarding the header / include files: > > > > License to copy and use this software is granted provided that it is >