[debian-legal] The legality of cdrecord

as it was LGPL. Yuhong Bao _ Express yourself with free Messenger emoticons. Get them today! http://www.freemessengeremoticons.ca/?icid=EMENCA122

Re: The legality of cdrecord

>The CDDL-licensed code is not included in the GPL program; the CDDL only >applies to the build scripts. Not anymore. Now almost all of the program is CDDL, except 2 libraries, one GPL, and one LGPL. mkisofs links to the GPL library, and that is the remaining problem. Yuho

RE: The legality of cdrecord

> Not anymore. Now almost all of the program is CDDL, except 2 libraries, one > GPL, and one LGPL. mkisofs links to the GPL library, and that is the > remaining problem. And it can be solved by removing HFS support. Yuhong Bao __

RE: The legality of cdrecord

ripts, are CDDL in current versions of > cdrtools. Now the remaining problem is about the GPLed library that the CDDL > mkisofs links to. Removing HFS support would solve this problem. Yuhong Bao _ Are you ready for Windows Live

DFSG is not suitable for things other than software

docs to go into non-free, as well as the Mozilla trademark and art problem that caused Firefox to be called Iceweasel in Debian. Yuhong Bao -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]