Ben Finney writes:
>> * Package name: spim
>> Version : 7.5-1
When I was asked to some university exercises with spim I used spimsal
4.4.2, a fork of an older version of spim that advertises itself to be
available under the terms of the GPL v1. How about packaging it
instead?
I'll
Sam McLeod writes:
> FYI - A computer shop has taken the Debian logo and used it for his
> business.
> Nowhere does the business mention Debian and when I sent the owner an email
> informing him of the misuse and linking him to debian.org/logos - he claimed
> he created the logo from scratch:
> (P
Jérémy Lal writes:
> could anyone help me resolve this license question :
> https://github.com/isaacs/inherits/commit/0b5b6e9964ca
That page contains more than one question.
If you want to include this software in Debian you need to get a
permission from the author to distribute and modify the s
Jérémy Lal writes:
> If i can tell the author "here's a known license that fits your needs",
> i can consider i answered him.
That's difficult since I'm not quite sure what he really wants. Is
"You may not release the Software under a more restrictive license
than this one."
trying to say that
Hello,
I realize that -legal is mainly for getting advice on what can be
included in Debian. However, if somebody has extra time I'd like to get
a second opinion on the license that the National Land Survey of Finland
is using for the dataset that they recently made public. This data might
get imp
Hi Clark and Francesco,
Poli writes:
> I am convinced that a good Free Software license would be suitable for
> releasing data.
> Hence, I think that this license, even if it managed to meet the DFSG
> (which it does *not*, in my own personal opinion!), would add nothing
> useful to the already l
[ Replying to an old thread. For your convenience here's a link to the
original thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/05/msg00014.html ]
Francesco Poli writes:
>> > * remove the name of the Licensor from the product or service, if
>> > required to do so by the Licensor.
>
> I a
Hi,
if
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681654#52
is correct and the issue is commercial use (and not nondistributability)
how about just moving kstars-data-extra-tycho2 to non-free instead of
having this bug delay wheezy release? You can always reintroduce it back
to main if the
"Rishoff, Justin" writes:
> Debian is part of our product development and for import reporting
> requirements we will need the Encryption Algorithms and key bit lengths that
> are employed.
>
> e.g. 56 bit DES
>
> Can you provide this for me?
The "openssl help" command alone lists quite a lot o
9 matches
Mail list logo
