On Wed, 24 Oct 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Sorry for the long quotings. They are just included to get the people
of Debian-legal informed.)
(Sorry once more Joe, I misspelled the debian-legal address in my first
porsting.)
> > there are many changes. Perhaps you have a look at the diffs. T
v 2001 15:00:06 +0100 (MET)
Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Tille, Andreas writes:
> "License" marked with *** *** by me
> ...
> *** MOLPHY is a free software, and you can use and redistribute it. ***
Please post this to debian-legal and get an opinion. I would not c
Hello
on Thu, 25 Oct 2001 I wrote to Debian legel the message
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200110/msg00161.html
but got neither privat response nor gives archive search any hint
about a response.
I wonder if this is no interesting question fo debian-legal or
if ther
On 22 Nov 2001, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Hm, as far as I can see from the list archives, you posting was a very
> hard-to-read one (no introduction to the problem, lots of badly
> formatted quotes before any real text begins, etc.). Perhaps if you
> repeated your question more concisely somebody w
--
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 08:38:49 -0800 (PST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tille Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Debian Package for Phylip
Andreas Tille --
> Moreover I cleaned up the lines a little bit. Sorry for the inconvience
> and the long posting.
I doubt anyone
On 22 Nov 2001, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit "Tille, Andreas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Joe just tried to clean up my rather confuse posting. Just forget about
> > that and try to find a suggestion for a DFSG free license which complies
> > with Joes
On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, John Galt wrote:
> >You might try to just raise a few questions:
> >1. Does any version of GPL restrict how much money redistributers
> > can charge for the software?
>
> The artistic sort of does, but that's not really a VERSION of the GPL
> _per se_, it's a completely diff
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Matti Koskimies wrote:
> Well, there actually *were* some problems, mainly the package needs a
> licensing change, which Teemu Hukkanen was looking into -- I'm not sure if
> there's been any progress on that.
Could xou please check whether the following license of imaze
h
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 01:45:19PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > * Package name: scummvm
> > Version : 0.2.0
> > Upstream Author : Ludvig Strigeus - Lead Programmer, Project Admin
> > and others - they provide only
9 matches
Mail list logo
