On 19 May 2000, Stephen Zander wrote:
> It *used* to be that hooks explicitly for crypto-support were caught
> by the BXA; you needed a general purpose help/plug-in framework to be
> OK.
> The recent rewrite of the regs may have relaxed this. IANAL.
Anyone who is a lawyer or knows one care to ch
Hi,
One of the programs I ITP is published under the GPL but links against Qt
1.0 (which is in non-free after all). Since that problem is a known one
(counting the number of hits Google produces), I wonder whether there is a
FAQ or some other text I could point the upstream author to that describe
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> QT 1 is not even in the Debian distribution anymore for several reasons one
> of which is this.
Hrm, good point. I'm still seeing the package because I also have stable
sources at a low priority.
> You should either convince upstream to convert the a
Hello,
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> (There is a special exception for the license texts and similar legal
> documents associated with works in Debian; modifications and derived
> works of these legal texts do not need to be allowed. This is a
> compromise: the Debian group encourages authors of
Hi,
I have been asked to provide packages for a small piece of software that
uses this licence:
This software is provided 'as-is', without any express or implied
warranty. In no event will the authors be held liable for any damages
arising from the use of this software.
Perm
5 matches
Mail list logo
