Re: request

2001-05-04 Thread Sergio Brandano
... > If you could explain the nature of these emails and why you would > not want them archived, perhaps you would get a sympathetic hearing. Yes, of course. We are friends. We are talking about written words, carrying the name of the author. These written words are being archived, indexed

Re: request

2001-05-05 Thread Sergio Brandano
... I understand and agree, to a certain extent, with your positions. In fact, I did *not* ask to get rid of a valuable media, as mailing lists are. You keep missing the point. I used the word ``friendship'' in the same sense as the GNU project has been using it; it is not a ``personal''

Re: request

2001-05-05 Thread Sergio Brandano
From: Gerfried Fuchs > Do you read all the agreements you sign? Of course I do. And if I do not like an agreement, I simply do not sign it. In the case with Debian, there is no such agreement; as if there where one such agreement, then any material posted in its lists would be a Debian copyri

Re: request

2001-05-05 Thread Sergio Brandano
> How did you get on this list without seeing, that it is archieved? ... because I originally posted a message to a single person, then discovered that it was a mailing list, then the discussion spread to two more lists thanks to one of the participants. As it is indeed posible to post in those

Re: request

2001-05-05 Thread Sergio Brandano
I am tired of all these messages! Stop posting! > Huh? You retain copyright to your postings that you > contribute, just as with any code you contribute. > It's NOT "(c) Debian". Nobody is claiming that you > have lost any rights to republish as you like. > It's your work. I see that there ar

Re: request

2001-05-06 Thread Sergio Brandano
" lists, I invite the interested correspondents to post to "legal". As I am not subscribed to any of them, please Cc to my mail address directly. Sergio -- >Subject: Re: request >From: Sergio Brandano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Sat, 05 May 2001 16:02

Re: request

2001-05-08 Thread Sergio Brandano
I am first replying to Antony, than to Bernhard. From Antony: > You just don't get it, do you? Just about all the mailing lists > newsgroups on the Internet are archived, and such archives are often > publicly accessible through the Internet. That is the way it works! > That is what a maili

Re:

2001-05-09 Thread Sergio Brandano
Jurgen, Mailing-list server programs do include a command to query on the listmembers. It is quite common. There would be no problem in triggering such a query just before posting, and attach the resulting list and the mail in one file, locally on my disk. There would be no problem, then to show

Re: request

2001-05-09 Thread Sergio Brandano
Jurgen, Mailing-list server programs do include a command to query on the listmembers. It is quite common. There would be no problem in triggering such a query just before posting, and attach the resulting list and the mail in one file, locally on my disk. There would be no problem, then to show

Re: request

2001-05-10 Thread Sergio Brandano
> So far, only James Miller and Florian Lohoff have shown a correct > reading of this discussion. An explicit OpenContent agreement is > indeed the way to go. I forgot to mention Sam TH, whose contribution basically says that *if* Debian has the right to keep an archive of a posted mail (

Re: request

2001-05-12 Thread Sergio Brandano
> Can you cite anything in the Berne convention or related treaties? > -- Jürgen A. Erhard - By [1](article 15, point 1), in order that the author of a protected work shall be regarded as such, it is sufficient for his name to appear on the work in the usual manner. - By [1](article 2,