--
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov
contents of the package interact with license stipulations.
--
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov
example
Manifesto from Emacs), they can agree with invariant sections in
documenation.
I believe in most cases we can agree with such a limitation.
--
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov
law. GPL lifts some limits to restrict users.
So does FDL.
--
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov
Branded wrote:
> I will both consent and interests of users and unoriginal. You
Да, Бранден, отличился :)
Интересно, что бы ты делал, если большинство разработчиков Дебиана были
русскими?
;)
--
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov
that if distribution of the package XXX is
illegal in the country YYY, but legal in ZZZ, Debian will not include
XXX?
Shouldn't it be better (in theory), that if package XXX will be excluded from
servers in country YYY, but still be available on server in ZZZ?
--
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov
people who want Debian to move FDL to non-free at
the same time want Debian to distribute non-free stuff.
Is it accidental?
--
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov
MJ Ray wrote:
>>> FDL supporters: how a license which forbids to put the document on an
>>> encrypted filesystem can be considered free? How a license which
forbids
>>
>>
>> Is it? Are you sure? Or do you plan to distribute encrypted Debian CD's?
>
>
>
> This is a question which has been asked
Peter S Galbraith wrote:
The GPL takes away the "freedom" to redistribute works as closed sources
or unmodifiable. But it enforces the freedoms we want. It protects the
This is what I name "deal". You claim to resist it, because your cow
will be disappointed.
--
be updated if it becomes out
of date.
--
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov
u buy, but it's very possible to do so...
Thank you Wouter.
--
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov
one definition
at the time DFSG was created (or one definition was just missed).
2. New license which depends on differnce between software and
documentation appears.
--
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov
12 matches
Mail list logo