On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 01:42:03AM -0700, tom said
> Maybe I should know much about buld_deb packaging, but from what I can
> read from mozilla [0], dealing with logos and trademark are allowed if
> there is no change in the code. Building a .deb is a change of the
> code, or is just an adaptation
> [ ] I am a Debian Developer as described in the Debian
> Constitution as of the date on this survey.
>
> === CUT HERE ===
--
Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Do I look like I want a CC?
Words of the day: Marxist Firewalls asset morse 64 Vauxhall Cross terrorist MD2
pgpA6RRyRIxLJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ERT. All rights reserved.
"DFN-CERT" has to re-license the software, Wolfgang Ley and Uwe
Ellermann do not hold the copyright and thus cannot re-license it.
--
Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Do I look like I want a CC?
Words of the day: emc Belknap NATO India RSA espionage Crypto AG hackers Merlin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 05:09:12PM -0500, sean finney said
> hey rob (and -legal),
>
> thanks for following up with me on this.
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 02:08:40AM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> > > * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms are permitted
> >
d he said he'd never been able to clarify
the license either. I emailed Eric Raymond about this directly, but I'm
yet to receive a response.
Sorry for not keeping the BTS informed, I'll forward Eric's reponse
if/when I get one.
--
Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
5 matches
Mail list logo
