Hi all
I have another question on the Gibraltar firewall distribution. It is put
together in Austria, but I already have a mirror site from which I do not know
if it is inside the USA. What is the legal situation at the moment ? Is it
possible to "export" software from the USA by download it from
Joseph Carter wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 07:21:57PM +0200, Jens Müller wrote:
> > No, that's illegal according to US export regulations (I think with
> > "software" you mean such software as covered by those regulations)
>
> Not so.
>
> Crypto software can now legally be exported provide
Mark Rafn wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
>
> > What I would like to have is some sort of protection for the ISO image
> > itself.
>
> Umm. Why? If you allow redistribution (which you must, because YOU are
> distributing based on permissio
Jens Müller wrote:
> > > Another example is Debian itself: There are some restrictions on what
> can be
> > > done with "official" and "non-official" ISO images (I think only the
> logo
> > > matters, but the principle is the same). I want something in that
> direction.
> >
> > You can use similar
Mark Rafn wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
>
> > That is exactly what I mean: if somebody sells his knowledge, his time
> > by selling support then he does not directly make profit with the ISO
> > images that are distributed freely. He/she makes hi
Adam Heath wrote:
>
> On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
>
> > Adam Heath wrote:
> > >
> > > Please see the comments on freshmeat.net about this. You are illegally
> > > distribution Debian. The GPL does not allow to you be more restrictive.
&g
Hi all,
For a Java client that is to be uploaded soon (fireflier, announced in
the last week on debian-devel), the Sun JSSE libraries are needed.
According to the license that comes with JSSE (attached to this mail),
redistribution seems to be allowed. I intend to distribute the JSSE jar
libr
Stephen Stafford wrote:
Henning Makholm has expressed some concerns in another mail which are valid.
History shows that Sun might be willing to grant an exception to alleviate
some of them though (see the exceptions given to blackdown.org for J2SE,
which is pretty much the same license AFAICT).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
The reason why freeswan can currently not go into main is an issue with some
code license that is bundled with it. I am struggling with this for quite
some time now and at the moment I need some help to clarify it
Freeswan (the user spa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
| Which parts of freeswan link against libdes? According to
| /usr/share/doc/freeswan/copyright, some parts are LGPL. Do we know for
| sure that libdes+GPL is happening?
No, not for sure. However, since the copyright situation
#x27;m not
that strict, I just want to avoid unauthorized modifications and people
selling the tools directly.
Thanks in advance
Rene
--
--
Rene Mayrhofer, ViaNova KEG NIC-HDL: RM1677-RIPE
Email: [EMAIL PROTECT
>
> This will have to go to non-free.
Thank you for the quick answer. I will put it in non-free/net.
Rene
--
--
Rene Mayrhofer, ViaNova KEG NIC-HDL: RM1677-RIPE
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I am packaging the pptpd daemon and modified versions of the ppp package
that include support for the Microsoft authentication and encryption.
PPTP is a protocol for building VPNs between a PPTP server/firewall and
PPTP clients (Win95, Win98, WinNT, Win2000, Linux, MacOS, ..). The
clients get a
Adam Heath wrote:
>
> On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
>
> > Adam Heath wrote:
> > >
> > > Please see the comments on freshmeat.net about this. You are illegally
> > > distribution Debian. The GPL does not allow to you be more restrictive.
&g
Hi all
I have another question on the Gibraltar firewall distribution. It is put
together in Austria, but I already have a mirror site from which I do not know
if it is inside the USA. What is the legal situation at the moment ? Is it
possible to "export" software from the USA by download it from
Joseph Carter wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 07:21:57PM +0200, Jens Müller wrote:
> > No, that's illegal according to US export regulations (I think with
> > "software" you mean such software as covered by those regulations)
>
> Not so.
>
> Crypto software can now legally be exported provid
Mark Rafn wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
>
> > What I would like to have is some sort of protection for the ISO image
> > itself.
>
> Umm. Why? If you allow redistribution (which you must, because YOU are
> distributing based on permissio
Jens Müller wrote:
> > > Another example is Debian itself: There are some restrictions on what
> can be
> > > done with "official" and "non-official" ISO images (I think only the
> logo
> > > matters, but the principle is the same). I want something in that
> direction.
> >
> > You can use similar
Mark Rafn wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
>
> > That is exactly what I mean: if somebody sells his knowledge, his time
> > by selling support then he does not directly make profit with the ISO
> > images that are distributed freely. He/s
19 matches
Mail list logo
