Simon Law wrote:
> Please use the official GNU sanctioned statement. It highlights
> that you shouldn't modify the GPL, and it also provides good
> boilerplate; so you don't have to make up your own.
>
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WritingFSWithNFLibs
Thanks to everyone f
Mark Purcell wrote:
> What I'm actually
> talking about is getting the licencing sorted out for the
> next release of
> hpoj to go into unstable (sid), so from that side there is no
> rush for HP
> to resolve the licence, just as long as it is being
> progressed within HP.
Hi, Mark and everyone
Mark Horn wrote:
> As a debian & hpoj user, I'd also like to see something in the LICENSE
> file that comes with the source code, so that it's clear that whatever
> the wording is that enables debian to link hpoj with OpenSSL and then
> redistribute hpoj, that this exception is not exclusively prov
Hi. After some back-and-forth discussion with our attorney, I would like to
propose the following OpenSSL exception statement to be applied to the
HP-copyrighted portion of the hpoj code which needs this (libptal and the
libraries and applications that link to it, but not ptal-mlcd):
In additio
4 matches
Mail list logo
