Re: reiser4 non-free?

2004-05-06 Thread Miros/law Baran
[reiserfs-list removed from Cc:] 6.05.2004 pisze (głupio) Hans Reiser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I just modified the Reiser4 license to be the following: > The Anti-Plagiarism License [rant, irrelevant here, cut] > The License: The Anti-plagiarism license is the Gnu Public License > Version 2 with

Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG

2005-07-23 Thread Miros/law Baran
23.07.2005 pisze Florian Weimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > What difference does upstream intent make to the freedoms that our users > > receive? > If upstreams sues you, the freedoms granted by the license texts don't > matter much. A court case is a great inconvenience, even if the > defendant w

Re: standard fonts and euro

2001-05-15 Thread Miros/law Baran
15.05.2001 pisze Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > BTW, Helvetica is registered trademark. I think XFree86 must get > permition to use that and other font trademarks in its modified > fonts. That is problem for Debian too. For example the fonts for ISO > 8859-2 in Debian don't use registered

Re: standard fonts and euro

2001-05-15 Thread Miros/law Baran
15.05.2001 pisze Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Because the vendor of these fonts doesn't have permition from the > trademark holders. XFree doesn't have such permition too and thats why > it is not allowed to distribute modified fonts with the same font names. > It must aither distribute