MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and libx264* and other codecs.

2006-04-29 Thread Matthew William Solloway Bell
The packages libxine1, ffmpeg, include libfaad*, libx264* or another codec which implement the MPEG-4 Advanced Audio Coding and Advanced Video Coding standards. Unfortunately, these are patent encumbered in at least the USA, and many other countries. To distribute code implementing any of these pa

Re: Re: MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and libx264* and other codecs.

2006-05-01 Thread Matthew William Solloway Bell
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 11:37:39PM +0100, Matthew William Solloway Bell wrote: > > The packages libxine1, ffmpeg, include libfaad*, libx264* or another > > codec which implement the MPEG-4 Advanced Audio Coding and Advanced > > Video Coding standards. Unfortunately, these

Re: Re: MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and libx264* and other codecs.

2006-05-01 Thread Matthew William Solloway Bell
Oops, My mistake libavcodec is not using libx264, but it's own AVC decoder, and the FAA{C,D} code is an interface only. Matthew W. S. Bell -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and libx264* and other codecs.

2006-05-01 Thread Matthew William Solloway Bell
So given my idiocy I'm going to leave that detective work to someone else. I think the general picture is slightly more clear than opaque now though. MWSBell -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: Re: MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and libx264* andother codecs.

2006-05-03 Thread Matthew William Solloway Bell
> So given my idiocy I'm going to leave that detective work to someone > else. I think the general picture is slightly more clear than opaque now > though. > > MWSBell I mean with respect to looking in packages to find out if they have a coder or a decoder. So, we have a document that supports

Re: MPEG-4 patent license issues - libfaad* and libx264* andother codecs.

2006-05-04 Thread Matthew William Solloway Bell
> OTOH, it looks like these packages currently in Debian do have upstreams, > against whom the patents have not been enforced, correct? Do we know of > *anyone* who's been C&D'ed specifically for distributing a *subset* of the > code in these packages? If not, it sounds like the lack of enforcem