it will not appear in the log file. The system call either
happens at `\output' time or right away, according to the absence
or presence of the `\immediate' prefix, as usual for \write. (If
you as a TeX administrator wish to implement more stringent rules
on what can be executed, you will ne
eedom (he distributed modified versions
of the cm fonts).
So yes, we value the interchangebilty of our documents higher
than the freedom to modify the components which are used by these
documents.
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom G
oles in LaTeX borders on either
ludicrious or paranoid (seen from 25 years of TeX history);
it is at best very hypothecial.
P.P.S.: The same potential "security problems" are relevant to
plain.tex, which everyone except Donald Knuth is
forbidden to change. Are
On 2002-07-17 10:39:53 -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> I am having trouble finding any file on my system (with tetex-base and
> tetex-extra installed) that is licensed in this way. What file did you
> pull this license from?
tex.web, which is the source for tex (the binary). Surely you
have the sour
same applies to PostScript: One fixes security holes in the
interpreter (e.g. GhostScript) and doesn't worry about the
PostScript files.
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen
Voice +49 4
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen
Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cannot assume that.
Of course, it's easiest to just send the source with the
binary in the first place.
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen
Voice +49 421 20419-44 /
ctually
> have any capabilities to do anything.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200207/msg00199.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200207/msg00140.html
Sorry, but are you trying to start a flame war?
Best regards
Martin
--
possible and legal to change the "virtual"
machine (tex in our case).
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen
Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10
--
To UNSUBS
egards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen
Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2002-07-26 15:16:09 -0400, Boris Veytsman wrote:
> > From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Schr=F6der?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On 2002-07-25 16:46:57 -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
> > > Um, no. In the case where package FOO needs package BAR,
> > > \NeedsTeXFormat has BAR tell FOO that BAR is a good versi
the Work -- such as but not limited to inclusion in a
publication, broadcast, compilation, or other media -- does not
bring the other works in the scope of the License; nor does such
aggregation void the terms of the License for the Work."
Best regards
Martin
--
M
to have precisely the same
character coding schemes and precisely the same font metric
files."
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen
Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10
On 2002-09-04 17:22:06 +0100, David Carlisle wrote:
> Note that the "millenium edition" is fairly new (as its name suggests)
> a combined set of all of the volumes, from 2000 or thereabouts.
And it is by all intentions the _last_ edition. :-)
Best regards
Martin
--
ile cmr10.tfm must contain the same metrices and encodings as
Knuth's. You may change the font (i.e. the appearance of the
glpyhs), but the metrices must be Knuth's.
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straß
On 2002-09-06 18:59:45 -0400, Dylan Thurston wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 03:35:17PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > The names could only be restricted if they are trademarked, which they
> > are not. "Computer Modern" might be trademarked (I don't know),
>
> It is, as indicated in the
On 2002-09-08 00:37:59 -0400, Brian Sniffen wrote:
> Computer Modern appears to be a trademark of the American Mathematical
> Society. I don't know what impact a lack of mention of that in vol
What makes you think that?
Best regards
Martin
--
http://www.tm.oneiros.de
On 2002-09-08 12:17:44 -0400, Brian Sniffen wrote:
> Knuth's own page on C&T lists only the trademarks of TeX and MF, so
> perhaps the CM trademark has gone unenforced or been dropped.
Since none of the books (and none of the cm files) and no
literatur on TeX mention CM as a trademark, I strongly
On 2002-10-07 12:47:51 -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Ali Akcaagac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > it's your definition isn't it ?
>
> No. Read www.opensource.org's definition at point 3:
Which is the definition of a body calling itself "Open Source
Initiative".
"Open source" at first means
On 2002-10-07 21:09:36 +0100, David Given wrote:
> * The owner may put the work into the public domain. This means
> that the work's owner is now the state, and the original owner
> loses all rights over it. The state automatically grants
This is only possible in some l
On 2002-10-08 00:02:54 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> The one that holds the trademark on "Open Source". Surely you must agree
> that that gives their definition special status?
Yes. They were the first to register this TM in the USA.
Best regards
Martin
--
http://www.tm.on
On 2003-04-16 14:28:44 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> I understand the rationale. I'm concerned about the wording. Would the
> following violate 5(c)?
>
> % LaTeX-Foobar 1.2.9, copyright 2001--2003 John A. Doe
> %
> % Please report errors to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> %
> % MODIFIED BY Jack Smith
On 2003-05-28 20:21:55 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Bah, there's no copyright in those lists; just like there's no copyright
> in the listings of the phone book.
Phone book data _is_ copyrighted in Germany.
Best regards
Martin
--
Our position is that whatever grievances a nation may have
On 2003-06-30 11:44:06 +0200, Baptiste SIMON wrote:
> we are in this situation... and I want to prevent changin license by
> holder of the copyright. So I'm looking for a solution, giving the
> copyright to something, under some terms, etc...
>
> Is there any solution ?
AFAIK No. Under european l
24 matches
Mail list logo
