On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:45:12PM -0300, Humberto Massa scribbled:
Do Cc: me on the replies, thank you
[snip]
> > It's simple - how is it possible that most licenses used by free
> >software are incompatible [1] with GPL and yet debian mixes them in many
> >projects
> >it distributes (like mozil
Hey all,
As in subject - http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/cryptlib/download.html
can the software be used/distributed in Debian?
thanks,
marek
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 03:39:59PM -0300, Humberto Massa scribbled:
> Marek Habersack wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:45:12PM -0300, Humberto Massa scribbled:
> >Do Cc: me on the replies, thank you
> >
> >[snip]
> >
> >
> >>>It's
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 10:08:11AM -0800, Don Armstrong scribbled:
[snip]
> > It's simple - how is it possible that most licenses used by free
> > software are incompatible [1] with GPL and yet debian mixes them in
> > many projects it distributes (like mozilla, php, apache to name the
> > most pro
> OK, the thing at stake is the use of OpenSSL or Cryptlib[1] in the
> Caudium[2] project. Looking at [2], I see clauses which make cryptlib not
> compatible with clauses #5 and #6 of the DFSG. The license is a BSD one,
> that's clear, but the terms of use and usage conditions seem to restrict the
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 11:53:46AM -0800, Don Armstrong scribbled:
> On Thu, 04 Mar 2004, Marek Habersack wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 10:08:11AM -0800, Don Armstrong scribbled:
> > > You (in general) can't incorporate code which is under a license that
> > >
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 01:06:20PM -0800, Don Armstrong scribbled:
>
> On Thu, 04 Mar 2004, Marek Habersack wrote:
> > if we have two source files A and B producing object files A and B,
> > with both of them calling (linking to in effect) some GPL API, A
> > being
** On Nov 13, Craig Sanders scribbled:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 04:45:51PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >err. debian CDs have a known market value, don't they? why not buy a
> > >debian CD for $2 or whatever they cost these days?
> > >
> > >add in the 30% tax and that's a total of $2.60 + p
** On Nov 13, Craig Sanders scribbled:
> > > the cost of the license.
> > I don't think it includes a cost of license. In few mails before I have
> > clarified it why.
>
> sure it does. the monetary cost of the license is zero dollars, which is
> clearly included in the price you paid for the CD
** On Nov 13, Mariusz Przygodzki scribbled:
> On Monday 13 November 2000 23:16, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > you will have a receipt for a software CD called Debian GNU/Linux.
> > that's what it cost you to buy it, including the cost of materials and
> > the cost of the license.
> I don't think it incl
** On Nov 14, Craig Sanders scribbled:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 01:08:59PM +0100, Marek Habersack wrote:
> > ** On Nov 13, Craig Sanders scribbled:
> > > sure it does. the monetary cost of the license is zero dollars, which is
> > > clearly included in the price you
** On Nov 14, Paul Slootman scribbled:
> On Wed 15 Nov 2000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 01:08:59PM +0100, Marek Habersack wrote:
> >
> > > What's funny, is that when you run a shop and you play radio so that
> > > customers can hear it
** On Nov 14, Craig Sanders scribbled:
[snip]
> > The *same* fee? So if you operate a broadcasting station that can
> > reach 10 million people, you pay the same amount as a shop that has
> > standing capacity for 10 people?
>
> no, i don't believe it's the exact same fee. i don't know what radio
13 matches
Mail list logo
