Re: Software definition, was: A possible GFDL compromise

2003-09-15 Thread Keith Stephen Dunwoody
On 15 Sep 2003, Mathieu Roy wrote: > MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapot? : > > > On 2003-09-15 07:40:04 +0100 Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > - But it may also means that the only content that can be on a > > > Debian CD must be software under the definition that I

Re: Software definition, was: A possible GFDL compromise

2003-09-15 Thread Keith Stephen Dunwoody
On 15 Sep 2003, Mathieu Roy wrote: > Keith Stephen Dunwoody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapot? : > > > On 15 Sep 2003, Mathieu Roy wrote: > > > > > MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapot? : > > > > > > > On 2003-09-15 07:40:04 +0100 Mathieu R

Re: a minimal copyleft

2003-08-04 Thread Keith Stephen Dunwoody
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote: > > (L) Public Property: You may do anything you want with this work > provided that you inform all recipients that all derived works must > likewise be Public Property. > I'm not really big into -legal, but I wonder if there might be some confusion