Re: CC's responses to v3draft comments

2006-09-28 Thread KWWU
>Indeed. Sadly, CC's anti-TPM language may(*) >prohibit iSuck owners >applying TPM themselves, as the copy would violate >the licence and the >anti-TPM measure is not limited to distribution. (* - > it's not entirely >clear to me, due to the recent comments and refusal >to explain.) Isn't this

Re: CC's responses to v3draft comments

2006-09-30 Thread KWWU
> >I'm thinking about them. Surely I can take a GPL > perl script and run it > >through a compiler, even the undump trick, and > distribute that compiled > >form, as long as I comply with the source supply > requirements of the GPL, > >can't I? > > Of course you can't. Because it is not human > r