Re: Bug#288429: asterisk: Hold music are not DFSG-free

tags 288429 -sarge-ignore thanks El lun, 03-01-2005 a las 20:57 +0100, Kilian Krause escribió: > tags 288429 +sarge-ignore > thanks > > Hi Jerome, > > Am Montag, den 03.01.2005, 19:40 +0100 schrieb Jerome Warnier: > > Subject: asterisk: Hold music are not DFSG-free > > Package: asterisk > > Vers

License issues (Was: [bug #288429] asterisk's music files are definately non-free)

for the purpose of removing only sounds affected by this license. Thanks P.S: Please, keep CC list, as I am not subscribed. -- Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente

MPL and Source Code

public. This can be comply by a note in debian/copyright file, as it will be included with every package released. Cheers, -- Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente

MPL and Source Code

. -- Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente

About Debian TM being registered in Spain (registrar answer)

ndle this? And, in addition, could SPI discuss if registering Debian and Debian logo Europe wide worth? If you need some kind of help with the language, please, contact any of us: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jacobo Tarrio <[EMAIL PR

Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?

ing to write a replacement for that tool in some weeks. -- Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

License clause, not allowing use of author's name for promoting

Hi, I am concerned about the following license snippet, basically point 3 which talk about use of authors' name. This comes from a source included in conduit (version 0.3.6, not yet uploaded) Please, CC me on replies --- Python bindings for the Box.net API Copyright (c) 2007 Thomas Van

Re: License clause, not allowing use of author's name for promoting

selin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le mercredi 23 janvier 2008 à 23:25 +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo a > écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I am concerned about the following license snippet, basically point 3 > > which talk about use of authors' name. &g

Wording for public domain

// To the extent possible under law, X // has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this work. Is this wording valid to be considered as Public Domain? Thanks -- José Carlos García Sogo    js...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.o

License issues (Was: [bug #288429] asterisk's music files are definately non-free)

for the purpose of removing only sounds affected by this license. Thanks P.S: Please, keep CC list, as I am not subscribed. -- Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente

Re: asterisk and mysql_cdr

ified GPL, but GPL with an exception from copyright holder of the source, which is the ultimate holder of any right over that piece of software. > > > > Hopefully I'm wrong somewhere... > > > > -- > > Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 +972-50-7952406 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com > > -- Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente