tly is glucas relation to GIMPS, especially the non-free terms
decribed in http://www.mersenne.org/prize.htm ?
--
Jens Peter Secher
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher get2net dk_
ng
> of this useful).
>
>
>
> We believe that this software is DFSG-free.
The summaries are a good idea, but this is overdoing it, don't you think?
--
Jens Peter
eresting discovery! But which part of the DFSG is violated here?
See eg.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200303/msg00405.html
--
Jens Peter Secher
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher get2net dk_
s.
Would that be a working solution?
--
Jens Peter Secher
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher get2net dk_
eers,
--
Jens Peter Secher
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.diku.dk/~jpsecher - (+45) 35 32 14 08
_OpenPGP fingerprint DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1_
x27;t the GPL essentially a counterexample? It was written with legal
> counsel, and many people have criticised it for it complexity.
Yes, but I think Branden is giving (splendid) advice to people writing
*new* licenses. If the GPL suits *your* needs, by all means, use it.
--
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_.
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?
in a minimal
environment. Otherwise I need to depend on a *specific* prior version
of the compiler, thus making the build more fragile (think Ubuntu), or
I need to depend on a wide range on prior versions of the compiler,
making testing much harder.
Cheers,
--
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 17
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_.
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
9 matches
Mail list logo