At Wed, 12 Nov 2003 13:17:18 -0800,
Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> >the LZW patent is still valid in Europe and Japan.
> >
> >Due to the possible legal risk for your users in Europe and Japan it's
> >still required to keep LZW code out of main.
That's right. FYI, in Japan, LZW p
At Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:36:40 +0100,
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > One of "More-clearly-free alternative scalable Japanese fonts" is
> > > kochi-mincho/kochi-gothic in sid/sarge. Many Japanese use this
> > > font rather than Watanabe font.
> >
> > If this alternative contains the necessary glyphs, then I
At Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:43:04 +0900,
Kenshi Muto wrote:
> > I think if your request was phrased differently, I think the outcome
> > may have been different.
> >
> > What we agreed was HITACHI's claim in current shape can not be the
> > reason to remove package.
> >
> > How we treat package with
At Fri, 21 Nov 2003 08:35:10 +,
Andrew Suffield wrote:
> [1 ]
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 09:52:01AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > At Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:36:40 +0100,
> > Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > > > One of "More-clearly-free alternative scalable Japanese
At Sun, 23 Nov 2003 09:58:09 -0500,
Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
>
> GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > At Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:01:39 -0500,
> > Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
> >> I'm confused -- and don't read Japanese. But let me get one thin
At Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:01:39 -0500,
Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
> I'm confused -- and don't read Japanese. But let me get one thing
> straight: what Hitachi distributed were strictly bitmap fonts, right?
> No metafont, truetype, or postscript font outlines, just bitmaps?
Well, it's complicated issue.
At Sat, 26 Oct 2002 20:13:21 -0500,
Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 10:09:34PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I disagree. The DFSG speaks explicitly of the licenses of the software
> > being distributed; software that may be illegal to use or distribute for
> > reasons *other t
7 matches
Mail list logo
