GR proposal: GFDL with no Invariant Sections is free

r before the "Why the GNU Free Documentation License is not suitable for Debian main" GR? -- Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In necessariis unitas, in dubiis libertas, in omnibus caritas. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: VoIP - patented codecs - question

On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 16:30, Csillag Kristóf wrote: > Maybe some of us could use G.723.1 for free (without breaking the law), > after all. Perhaps it would be possible to convince MicroTelco to support a free codec? -- Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> paniq.net

Re: Request for GR: clarifying the license text licensing / freeness issue

iously. No violation has been shown to exist. A concern has been raised, but it is the result of a misunderstanding and/or misinterpretation of the Social Contract and DFSG. It is not the same as an actual violation. Thus, there's no need to change the documents in question. -- Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Request for GR: clarifying the license text licensing / freeness issue

been shown quite strongly that it is not needed. The rest of the discussion I consider part of the community tradition, the purpose of which is to gain further insight into the documents in question. -- Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Request for GR: clarifying the license text licensing / freeness issue

r opinion, but I have already given my comment on them. -- Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Request for GR: clarifying the license text licensing / freeness issue

and licenses belong to different domains and that licenses form the line beyond which the DFSG doesn't apply. The DFSG seems to be drafted on this principle, and there is therefore no contradiction that needs to be clarified or given explicit exception. Not starting to "move up the chain" spares us from approaching the slippery slope of mistakes that others in this thread have brought up. So let's not pursue this GR. Cheers, -- Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Request for GR: clarifying the license text licensing / freeness issue

room, discussing in the corridor, lights are being shut off, everyone else has gone home and the janitor is rattling with his keychain and giving us meaningful looks as he's making his final round before locking up for the weekend..." :) Thanks, -- Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part