Free Software and thus eligible for inclusion in the Debian OS.
>
> [ ] None of the above statements approximates my opinion.
>
> Part 2. Status of Respondent
>
> Please mark with an "X" the following item only if it is true.
>
> [ X ] I am a Debian
ieve that "there is no such Good on Earth that is worth a
single child's teardrop", can you at least agree that _some_ methods are
not worth the goal, and that _some_ cure is worse than the desease?
--
Dmitry Borodaenko
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 03:01:40PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 08:21:43PM +0300, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
> > Every? That sounds just like "Noble goal justifies vile means". Even
> > if you don't believe that "there is no such Good
opyright
holder.' to the license reference or copy.
Which means that each OPL-licensed work should be examined for these
options, which, if enabled, make it non-free.
--
Dmitry Borodaenko
and liberty to take away, and liberty to take away liberty. As
I've shown above, liberty to remove material _can_ be essential.
--
Dmitry Borodaenko
aw that line, which is also an important factor
when speaking in _social_ context.
--
Dmitry Borodaenko
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 10:14:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 03:05:23PM +0200, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
> > This bus is open for 11 months already (since 03 Apr 2001), and
> > doc-rfc maintainer told the world that he is not going to do
> > any
in solving the ultimate task of creating a unified
copyleft license.
--
Dmitry Borodaenko
#x27;m dead.
The only difference between source as a source code and source as a
revision history is size, and I intentionally limited your
responsibility to only the modifications that you make, in order to
guarantee that both source size and amount of effort and money spent is
finite and marginal in comparison with effort and money spent on
producing the modification in question.
--
Dmitry Borodaenko
he original version, so that the whole chain can be restored at any
moment. GPL only takes care of 'source code v2 -> binary' part.
--
Dmitry Borodaenko
logical order.
Also, if you want to use 'the most informative' as a guideline to
determining the 'preferred form for making modifications', revision
history is definitely more informative than either of these versions
alone.
--
Dmitry Borodaenko
comparison with effort
DB>> and money spent on producing the modification in question.
AD> The storage space may be. The network bandwidth may be. The effort
AD> organizing it (and fulfilling requests) probably isn't, at least
AD> for small works.
This is something that we have to figure out, I still believe that there
are ways to address all the difficulties you've pointed out.
--
Dmitry Borodaenko
12 matches
Mail list logo
