J.B. Nicholson-Owens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >The litmus test here is "a significant amount of functionality", not
> >"will refuse to work at all without it", although that's a fairly
> >good description of a console without a ROM.
>
> Would one ROM cut it, then? I am working to determine if one
David Starner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > * That which is in main must be buildable and usable solely with
> > packages also in main (IOW, main is a "closure");
>
> Really? Does that mean that the Windows specific parts of GCC must be
> removed from the tarball? Or does it only apply to programs, so
Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2003, Joe Drew wrote:
> > So far as I know, it is not illegal to infringe on somebody else's
> > patents. AIUI patent holders can enforce (or not) their patents at
> > will by suing, but doing so is their perogative and no law makes it
> > wrong
Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > - one is taken from RFC 3174
> > (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3174.html, license terms at the end).
>
> Not a chance, that's nowhere near GPL-compatible.
>
> It also appears to be non-free in its own right.
>
> > I don't like the wording of "derivative
4 matches
Mail list logo
