* Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-05 21:14:20]:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:59:10PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> > I just chatted with Sun's FOSS embassador Simon Phillips and i
> > asked if Sun would switch to a LGPL compatible license even for
> >
* Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-12 23:40:57]:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 12:13:51 +1000, Anthony Towns
> said:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:21:08PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> > But instead, what I'm led to wonder is if this is really standing up
> > for our beliefs and
I would like to improof security of debian packages by adding a lexical
scanner (searching for all kinds of insecure commands and programming
practices) into tools like lintian or the buildaemons.
A guy (John Viega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) allready has some of the features I would
like to see in this
hehe. here it comes.
ITS4 (It's The Software, Stupid! -- Security Scanner)
NON-COMMERCIAL LICENSE (Version 1, Feb 17, 2000)
Copyright (C) 2000, Cigital, Inc.
All rights reserved.
For commercial licensing please contact Cigital, Inc. Cigital,
Inc. has exclusive licensing rights for the technolog
I would be interested in the results of the license-debate.
long before I posted the ITP on -devel I had posted about the license to
-legal.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal-0010/msg00018.html
I can understand that people are not interested in reading long legal
documents, that is why I am no
I consider packaging ecos. Please look at the license here:
http://sources.redhat.com/ecos/license-overview.html
I think it qualifies as free. But there is some fishy thing that changes made
to the system must be announced.
Please comment!
Since I am not on this list, please Cc: me.
Please let me know what you think of this.
--- Begin Message ---
Andreas Schuldei wrote:
>
> When I read the eCos licens I get the impression that it is intended as a
> free, open license. However, there are issues to keep it from beeing free in
> the sense of the Debian free softwa
view has to it, legaly. I would like
to see a strong support for embedded systems in debian, And I would like to
have ecos in main.
--- Begin Message ---
Andreas Schuldei wrote:
>
> When I read the eCos licens I get the impression that it is intended as a
> free, open license. However,
will be more challenging to ship a
floppy with every embedded system you build compared to setting up a server
that provides electronic access (or shipping said sources to Red Hat once).
M
Andreas Schuldei wrote:
>
> Dear Mr Tiemann!
>
> Thank you for your great work you have do
I had send a request for comment to this list some weeks before
( http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal-0012/msg00096.html and here
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal-0012/msg00120.html). I guess there is
some reason for not answering. If it was due to holidays and tight schedules,
could you look
10 matches
Mail list logo
