On 1/5/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > But not all documentation is attached to a software. For instance, if
> > I write a book "Software development on Debian", releasing it under
> > the GFDL is still the reasonable thing to do.
>
> It's reasona
On 1/7/06, Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've already talked to CC and they agreed to fix their licenses; 3.0
> and later should be fine, when they're released (2.x never will be).
>
Well - it's a goal for CC & FSF to permit content to move freely
between CC-BY-SA and GFDL (or possi
On 1/10/06, Benj. Mako Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That pipeline will almost certainly be GFDL/CC-BY-SA. It's really sad
> > to see blood boil over these licenses. Since I am talking to people
> > at FSF & CC regularly, I would be more than happy to bring Debian
> > concerns to both gr
3 matches
Mail list logo
