Re: Successful transmission from Kayla

2004-08-16 Thread Alan
begzkoeps? tqhpemomn epecvbpst xpqji qmnio dwtpqtly Do you know that congress just passed a new law and you can spwhxv afxpdhh rxyscns, oibuxuv r e f inance your - mo. r t gage with ZERO ra t e? jaurj qmnqivah cyvmo lzibrkty - ryyilryi kakebk Find out if you fit their requirements! odwlduw

Re: [PEAR-QA] PHP License

2005-08-23 Thread Alan Knowles
licence... and just rename the phrases in 3-5 to say PEAR instead of PHP Regards Alan On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 18:30 -0400, Charles Fry wrote: > Hi, > > I am working with other members of the Debian devlopment team to include > many of your fine PEAR packages in Debian. One recurring

Finjan NG5000 Web Proxy

2005-11-09 Thread Alan Dawson
Hi, A company I work for is evaluating the http://www.finjan.com/products/EnterpriseProducts/NG5000/ Web proxy device. When it boots it outputs to a monitor ( amongst other things ) Uncompressing Linux .. INIT: Entering Run Level 2 .. Starting system log daemon: syslogd Starting kernel log da

Re: Finjan NG5000 Web Proxy

2005-11-09 Thread Alan Dawson
Quoting Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I can't find any mention of Debian in the documentation or their website > > There's no need for them to mention Debian. However, the source should > be provided alongside with the device. If it isn't, and if there isn't a > written offer to get

Re: GPL-script to be run on a non-free interpreter

2002-08-04 Thread Alan Shutko
L requires you to do this? It seems that this link is apropos: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#InterpreterIncompat -- Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors! In cyberspace no one can hear your stomach rumble.

Re: GPL-script to be run on a non-free interpreter

2002-08-04 Thread Alan Shutko
e-compiler, if we only shipped compiled versions, but it isn't a problem here. -- Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors! The Illuminati aren't out to get you. What was your name?

Re: TeX Licenses & teTeX (Was: Re: forwarded message from Jeff Licquia)

2002-08-08 Thread Alan Shutko
n't know if the switch had anything to do with the font fiasco... teTeX was just better. -- Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors! Guns don't kill people off-line readers do.

Re: non-software violates social contract?

2002-08-27 Thread Alan Shutko
gested version of PS, for easy interpretation. I do not believe it has any control structure (unless you include javascript, which it allows). Type 1 was similarly designed as a simplification to make ATM work easily. I think that for anything programmatic, you have to use Type 3 -- Al

Re: The Open Source movement and Free Software movement are not the same

2002-10-10 Thread Alan Shutko
Open Source trademark show. Naturally, it has the same problem. I really need a Schadenfreude tagline -- Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors! "Die: To stop sinning suddenly."

Re: BSD license, core libraries, and NetBSD

2002-10-15 Thread Alan Shutko
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The clause quoted there has the number 3 attached to it. Again: What > is the fourth clause of the license you're referring to? Or is there a > zeroth clause? Take a look at http://www.closedbsd.org/pub/COPYRIGHT for an examp

Re: Berkeley DB curious licensing practice

2002-10-28 Thread Alan Shutko
You can redistribute BDB alone however you want. If you are redistributing it with an application, the app has to be open source. -- Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors! I was up above, now I'm down in it

Licensing of shareware quake data

2003-05-03 Thread Alan Woodland
in a package is oK? Clearly the shareware data counts as non-free, and I could just make a package to download it, but I thought I should seek advice here first. Thanks, Alan

Re: Licensing of shareware quake data

2003-05-03 Thread Alan Woodland
I've attached it to this email (Im not sure the list permits attachments though) Alan Walter Landry wrote: Do you have a link to the whole license? It would be nice to see everything in context before making a decision. Regards, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] SHAREWARE VE

Choosing a license for stumbleupon

2003-05-29 Thread Alan Woodland
fit of MPL. On the other hand, I would also like to stop people from using the directly in proprietary software (which I remember being a disadvantage of BSD, and maybe MPL???) Thanks, Alan

Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-06 Thread Alan Cox
kernel now we have initrd and firmware loaders. Alan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

NEC Licence (Work of US Gov. Employees)

1999-06-06 Thread Alan Bain
re what should go in the copyright file (at the moment it is the comments shown above!). I'd appreciate a source of information on what makes work of US goverment employees `public domain'. Alan Bain

License question: GPL+Exception

2007-05-12 Thread Alan Baghumian
r to ask debian-legal about the license before uploading the package. You can find the exact license here: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-fonts/packages/ttf-liberation/trunk/debian/copyright?op=file&rev=0&sc=0 Please advise if it's needed to add something in the copyright file o

IBM Public license compatibility

2008-04-17 Thread Alan Woodland
ed > with OpenDx, that has, if I remember correctly, a GPL-incompatible license. > > What do you think? Anyway, I'm pretty sure it's not compatible with GPL, so does anyone have any suggestions for a similar suitable alternative that would be compatible with the IBM public licens

Re: When will KDE and Debian get together?

2000-05-25 Thread Alan W. Irwin
Debian website just like for many other packages (e.g., Qt1, the source of the original controversy) that have been judged by the Debian community to be freedom impaired in some way. Alan W. Irwin email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: 250-727-2902 FAX: 250-721-7715 snail-mail: Dr. Alan W. Irwin Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3055, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8W 3P6 __ Linux-powered astrophysics __

Re: When will KDE and Debian get together?

2000-05-28 Thread Alan W. Irwin
about the url of the English translation of the interview that got this whole discussion started). On Sun, 28 May 2000, Tobias Peters wrote: > In the May 25 lwn, Alan W. Irwin writes: > > > I suspect this bad situation is a leftover from the old flame wars that > > used to erupt

Re: When will KDE and Debian get together?

2000-05-29 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On Sun, 28 May 2000, Joey Hess wrote: > Alan W. Irwin wrote: > > One current problem for Debian (unlike rpm-based distributions) is it does > > not have a standard source-package format. > > You are quite mistaken. Debian may not have a source package format that > rpm us

Re: When will KDE and Debian get together?

2000-05-29 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On Mon, 29 May 2000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 10:04:30AM -0700, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > [in response to Tobias Peters] > > > I can see why neither Debian nor KDE wants to change here, and it is also a > > practical impossibility for KDE. Unfortunate

Re: When will KDE and Debian get together?

2000-05-29 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On Mon, 29 May 2000, Joey Hess wrote: > > Alan W. Irwin wrote: > > But my impression is that not every debianized source tree can be used with > > the debuild command. For example, can you use debuild with the debianized > > pine source tree that is distributed with De

Re: CMU LTI Licence

2010-01-23 Thread Alan W Black
tly stated the reasoning we made to choose that particular license so that is was clear that it was a deliberate choice, and make clearly the consequences (e.g. incompatibility with GPL) to those who are not so familiar with the nuances of the open source licenses. Alan Best wishes, Fran E