On Saturday, March 8, 2025 7:46:58 PM MST Maytham Alsudany wrote:
> Hi debian-legal,
>
> Today I was reviewing a package[1] that contains a file[2] from Project
> Gutenberg. d/copyright had listed it under Public-Domain, and it would
> seem that way from the website[3] where it says "Public domain
On Saturday, March 8, 2025 7:46:58 PM MST Maytham Alsudany wrote:
> Hi debian-legal,
>
> Today I was reviewing a package[1] that contains a file[2] from Project
> Gutenberg. d/copyright had listed it under Public-Domain, and it would
> seem that way from the website[3] where it says "Public domain
Hi debian-legal,
Today I was reviewing a package[1] that contains a file[2] from Project
Gutenberg. d/copyright had listed it under Public-Domain, and it would
seem that way from the website[3] where it says "Public domain in the
USA", but the header in the file indicated that it was licensed "und
On Sat, 2025-03-08 at 20:24 -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
[...]
>
> I agree with your analysis, the Project Gutenberg license is not DFSG-
> free, most particularly because of the restrictions on commercial use.
It appears this has been discussed before:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2017/
4 matches
Mail list logo
