Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses

hi Francesco, > I would say that the missing detail is that license compatibility is > not a transitive relation! indeed! I knew that but somehow it fell off my consciousness while looking at that wikipedia diagram > Well, before I start sending patches (for instance to reintroduce GPL-2 > in th

Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses

hi Nicolas, thanks for the feedback! On Tue Jul 2, 2024 at 10:24 PM CEST, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > right, I guess that's why the wikipedia diagram distinguishes between MPL-2 > > and > > MPL-2-no-copyleft-exception. I think that we don't have to worry about that > > because spdx.org/license