Re: Missing copyright clause of debian directory

2024-04-12 Thread Richard Laager
I've only looked at this situation for a total of five minutes prior to writing this email, so take this with a grain of salt. But to help you make forward progress... Upstream seems to use GPL-3+ (not GPL-3). For example: https://github.com/fxbois/web-mode/blob/a9d21841224da3295f2dd0a90022f5e4

Re: Missing copyright clause of debian directory

2024-04-12 Thread Soren Stoutner
As an additional comment, I currently maintain Electrum. Upstream is licensed Expat. Previous maintainers licensed their debian/* contributions GPLv3+. When I took over the package, I started working closely with upstream and wanted to contribute patches and other files, like AppSream meta

Re: Missing copyright clause of debian directory

2024-04-12 Thread Soren Stoutner
As an additional followup, as the original debian/* files were licensed GPLv2+, if you edit a file you can choose to make your contribution GPLv3+, which would convert the entire file to GPLv3+. If you end up editing all of the files in debian/* at least once, you could convert the entire copyr

Re: Missing copyright clause of debian directory

2024-04-12 Thread Soren Stoutner
"that’s the beauty of using GPLv2+ instead of GPLv2: it can be converted to later versions *WITHOUT* any additional permission from the copyright holders” That was an egregious enough typo that I felt compelled to send another email. I apologize for the noise. On Friday, April 12, 2024 12:48