Hi Andreas,
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 08:25:29AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since this issue becomes complex I'd like to bring up it at debian-legal
> list for advise.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
(usual disclaimer: IANAL. This below is only are few cents and thought on the
On Sun, 29 Aug 2021 20:16:57 -0400 Jeffrey H. Johnson wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm contacting the list to inquire regarding the acceptability
> of the following proposed documentation license, as I'd like to
> ensure that it will become be an impediment to having
> documentation licensed under it
Hi,
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 08:08:26AM +0200, Ole Tange wrote:
> >
> > If you want to remove the citation notice ...
> > nothing else gives you the right to change it.
Can we ship GNU Parallel with a small wrapper that removes the notice?
Being text-based, it would not modify the software at al
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 06:18:20AM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
>
> Can we ship GNU Parallel with a small wrapper that removes the notice?
> Being text-based, it would not modify the software at all. I am
> thinking about something like:
>
> $ echo 'NOTICE: Wanted output.' | perl -pe '{ s/^NOTICE:
Hi,
Could you do a review of https://github.com/JabRef/abbrv.jabref.org/ ?
I do not know the legal status of this kind of database
Bastien
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 3:38 PM Andreas Tille wrote:
:
> I admit I also considered a wrapper but with a different functionality:
> Simply check whether --citation was used before and if not do so.
If you mean a wrapper similar to this, then that would be a compromise
I can live with:
if [ -t 2 -
Bastien ROUCARIES writes:
> Could you do a review of https://github.com/JabRef/abbrv.jabref.org/ ?
>
> I do not know the legal status of this kind of database
According to
https://github.com/JabRef/abbrv.jabref.org/blob/master/LICENSE.md
it is covered by CC0, which is fine for Debian.
Cheers,
I thank everyone for the feedback,
Rather than address every individual point of the replies, or propose
updated text, it might be most helpful to explain the intent. I absolutely
will take into consideration and agree with comments and concerns
regarding license proliferation.
The documentation/
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 02:43:34PM -0400, Jeffrey H. Johnson wrote:
(IANAL, IANFTPM (I am not ftp master), etc.)
I hope you can really find a way to use a standard license. License
profiliration
is really becoming harmful to FOSS.
ENOTIME for a complete reply to your mail, but two remarks:
(..
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 07:22:52PM +0200, Ole Tange wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 3:38 PM Andreas Tille wrote:
> :
> > I admit I also considered a wrapper but with a different functionality:
> > Simply check whether --citation was used before and if not do so.
>
> If you mean a wrapper similar
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 07:22:52PM +0200, Ole Tange wrote:
> To me it would feel similar to a dialog box, where you have to click
> "Don't show this again" to continue the first time. This is not that
> uncommon in graphical tools, so there is some precedence for this.
as explained earlier: click-
11 matches
Mail list logo
