Carsten Leonhardt writes ("Re: SHA1 implementation by Steve Reid"):
> Ian Jackson writes:
> > And, if at any point in the future somebody takes a more legalistic
> > view and starts sending takedown notices, we can just throw away our
> > existing version based on the old RFC's code and redo the i
Ian Jackson writes:
> The main point of my message, which you are replying to, was that:
> this is pointless makework.
> If I were the Bacula maintainer I would drop the sha*.[ch]-related
> Debian delta, in my next upload, based on the arguments I make in this
> thread.
Thank you for this very
2 matches
Mail list logo
