Wily may be non-free

2017-08-21 Thread Jacob Adams
I was looking into the packages NMUed by reproducible builds and stumbled across wily. It is currently in debian main, but appears to be non-free. According to d/copyright it is covered by the Artistic license [1]. However, it includes two libraries that are compiled into the final executable, l

Re: Wily may be non-free

2017-08-21 Thread Ben Finney
Jacob Adams writes: > It is currently in debian main, but appears to be non-free. Thank you for drawing attention to this. > However, it includes two libraries that are compiled into the final > executable, libframe and libXg. Both these libraries contain the > following copyright notice at the

Re: Wily may be non-free

2017-08-21 Thread Jacob Adams
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 05:50:34AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > > That seems pretty clearly non-free to be, but as it's currently in > > Debian, I figured I would ask here before filing an RM bug against > > wily. > > I think you can make a bug report to discuss the matter. Start it at > “important”

Re: Wily may be non-free

2017-08-21 Thread Ben Finney
Jacob Adams writes: > I've now filed a bug (#872866) but, given the current state of the > wily package, I decided to set the severity to serious. That sounds fine, thank you for submitting that report. -- \ “I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as | `\ my t