Re: OpenSSL license for new packages.

2017-07-28 Thread Ian Jackson
Paulo Ricardo Paz Vital writes ("OpenSSL license for new packages."): > I'm intending to package the openssl-ibmca library for s390 arch into > Debian and I have a question about the license. Thanks for getting in touch. > Since this is an engine for OpenSSL, we have choose the license as > OpenS

Re: OpenSSL license for new packages.

2017-07-28 Thread Ian Jackson
Ben Finney writes ("Re: OpenSSL license for new packages."): > Paulo Ricardo Paz Vital writes: > > > Since this is an engine for OpenSSL, we have choose the license as > > OpenSSL License, which is based on BSD license. > > Two problems with that: > > * There are multiple licenses that meet the

Re: OpenSSL license for new packages.

2017-07-28 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 07/28/2017 02:45 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > I looked at the git repository linked to, and a few guessing clicks > got me here > https://github.com/opencryptoki/openssl-ibmca/blob/master/src/e_ibmca.c > which is the full licence text. That would make the other statements about containing OpenSSL

Re: OpenSSL license for new packages.

2017-07-28 Thread Ian Jackson
Kristian Fiskerstrand writes ("Re: OpenSSL license for new packages."): > On 07/28/2017 02:45 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I looked at the git repository linked to, and a few guessing clicks > > got me here > > https://github.com/opencryptoki/openssl-ibmca/blob/master/src/e_ibmca.c > > which is the

Re: OpenSSL license for new packages.

2017-07-28 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 07/28/2017 06:12 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > The name of the project would be problematic, except that: I read > "this software" here as referring to OpenSSL itself and openssl-ibmca > is not derived from openssl, so is not caught by this clause. Indeed, I mistakenly first thought the file was cop