On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:44 AM, Walter Landry wrote:
> The Software license looks fine. It is the Document license which is
> problematic. The first link above claims that there are many files
> already in Debian already under the W3C document license. I could not
> find any with a cursory sea
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:44 AM, Walter Landry wrote:
> Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> In the PyCSW discussion a good argument was made about the OGC Software
>> Notice terms not being problematic for Debian, because its terms are
>> identical to the W3C licenses and we have files licensed under
2 matches
Mail list logo
