[A]GPL vs Apache 2

Hi, If I was to make a tool for general purpose, to help others, and ensure freedom is guaranteed, I'd go with [A]GPL. If I want to make a commercial product, I would go and opt for a proprietary license. Now I see a reason for people choosing other licenses, like Apache, is calling it being more

Re: [A]GPL vs Apache 2

On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 22:58:49 +0530 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Hi, > > If I was to make a tool for general purpose, to help others, and ensure > freedom is guaranteed, I'd go with [A]GPL. If I want to make a > commercial product, I would go and opt for a proprietary license. > > Now I see a reas

Re: [A]GPL vs Apache 2

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:16 AM, Riley Baird wrote: > Not necessarily. It could mean that you want to be as compatible with > as many open-source licenses as possible. The Apache licenses don't fit that definition of "permissive" but they do fit the definition suggested by Ritesh and the definitio