Charles Plessy wrote:
> Here are a few comments about the license.
>
> - point 3) is poorly worded, but assuming it is well-intented, it is Free.
I would strongly disagree here. Requiring documentation of any sort
in addition to the source code is a big step. This is not a minor
thing.
> -
On 12/06/15 23:22, Walter Landry wrote:
Charles Plessy wrote:
Here are a few comments about the license.
- point 3) is poorly worded, but assuming it is well-intented, it is Free.
I would strongly disagree here. Requiring documentation of any sort
in addition to the source code is a big st
(CCing Bálint again, see previous mail in
https://lists.debian.org/557459e3.6090...@debian.org)
On 07/06/15 16:49, Simon McVittie:
On 07/06/15 14:19, Bálint Réczey wrote:
The question now is how we should interpret DFSG with regard to Live
DVD-s. Should we stop packaging Libav (and later FFmpe
Ángel González wrote:
> On 12/06/15 23:22, Walter Landry wrote:
>> Charles Plessy wrote:
>>> Here are a few comments about the license.
>>>
>>> - point 3) is poorly worded, but assuming it is well-intented, it is
>>> - Free.
>> I would strongly disagree here. Requiring documentation of any s
4 matches
Mail list logo
