Re: gpuocelot / beignet license problem

2015-05-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
(Summary of previous discussion: beignet 1.0+ contains 2 files based on gpuocelot[0], under a license that is not allowed in Debian[1,2], and is possibly LGPL-incompatible enough to prohibit distribution of beignet binaries[1,4]. Current gpuocelot[3] has a new top-level LICENSE notice without

Re: gpuocelot / beignet license problem

2015-05-14 Thread Ben Finney
"Rebecca N. Palmer" writes: > I investigated the possibility of packaging gpuocelot itself, both in > the hope that gpuocelot's authors would be more likely to agree to > fix/clarify the license for its own benefit than for beignet's, and > because "freeing CUDA" actually looked interesting (I ha